Relevance of Self-Consciousness of Appearance on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Rhinoplasty: a 12-Month Follow-up Prospective Study
- PMID: 38200126
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03803-3
Relevance of Self-Consciousness of Appearance on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Rhinoplasty: a 12-Month Follow-up Prospective Study
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty procedure has a strong impact on patient quality of life. Plastic surgery patients show a degree of appearance-related distress higher than general population, especially patients undergoing rhinoplasty. Relationship between patient-reported outcome after rhinoplasty and self-consciousness of appearance needs further studies. The aim of this study is to investigate this correlation, considering the surgeon external evaluation as well.
Materials and methods: A total of 50 consecutive patients underwent primary cosmetofunctional rhinoseptoplasty. Appearance-related distress and surgical outcome were assessed by DAS59 (Derriford Appearance Scale 59) and SCHNOS (Standardised Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey), administered before and after surgery. Follow-up period was 12 months. Third-party clinical outcome was evaluated by three plastic surgeons by a scale ranging from 1 (poor outcome) to 5 (excellent outcome).
Results: A first division in Group 1 (satisfied) and Group 2 (unsatisfied) was done. DAS59 mean score in Group 1 showed to be statistically lower than Group 2 (p value < 0.05). Spearman's test showed a large strong positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative DAS59 and SCHNOS-C score variations (Delta 0-12 months) (r = 0.7514, p<0.001), as well as between DAS59 and SCHNOS-O (r = 0.5117, p<0.001) and between SCHNOS-C and SCHNOS-O (r = 0.6928, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Rhinoseptoplasty has a significant impact on the patient self-consciousness of appearance, in both negative and positive terms. We emphasize the surgeon's burden, who need to carefully assess and address the patient's expectations during the first evaluation. This distinction is crucial since unrealistic expectations may lead to dissatisfaction even after a properly performed procedure.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Keywords: Appearance-related distress; DAS59; Outcome; PROMs; Primary rhinoplasty; SCHNOS; Satisfaction.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal Individuals.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(20):4121-4129. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03961-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38575764
-
Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS Scales.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):728-734. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03151-8. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36302983 Clinical Trial.
-
Does self-consciousness of appearance influence postoperative satisfaction in rhinoplasty?J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jan;71(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 16. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018. PMID: 28923458
-
Systematic Review of Quality-of-Life Measurement After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1635-1647. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1199-6. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 30019242
-
Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Conventional Dorsal Hump Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04828-6. Online ahead of print. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 40195129 Review.
References
-
- ISAPS (2021) Global survey 2021: Full report and press releases. [Cited 2023 Jul 21]. Available from: https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and...
-
- Chen K, Zhou L (2023) The effect of functional rhinoplasty on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03390-3
-
- Papadopulos NA, Liebmann J, Kloeppel M, Henrich G, Machens HG, Staudenmaier R et al (2021) Quality of life after rhinoplasty: a prospective study. Facial Plast Surg 37(5):639–645 - PubMed
-
- Saleh H, Rennie C (2018) Assessment and the psychological aspects for septorhinoplasty. Int J Head Neck Surg 9(1):38–45
-
- Amodeo CA (2007) The central role of the nose in the face and the psyche: review of the nose and the psyche. Aesthet Plast Surg 31(4):406–410
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials