Diagnostic performance of MRI for residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment according to contrast agent type: a systematic review and meta‑analysis
- PMID: 38200213
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04143-1
Diagnostic performance of MRI for residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment according to contrast agent type: a systematic review and meta‑analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The ideal contrast agent for imaging patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following locoregional therapies (LRT) remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agent (EOB-MRI) in detecting residual or recurrence HCC following LRT.
Methods: Original studies comparing the diagnostic performance of ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI were systematically identified through comprehensive searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI were calculated using a bivariate-random-effects model. Subgroup-analyses were conducted to compare the diagnostic performance of ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI according to different variables. Meta-regression analysis was employed to explore potential sources of study heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 15 eligible studies encompassing 803 patients and 1018 lesions were included. Comparative analysis revealed no significant difference between ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI in the overall pooled sensitivity (87% vs. 79%) and specificity (92% vs. 96%) for the detection of residual or recurrent HCC after LRT (P = 0.41), with comparable areas under the HSROC of 0.95 and 0.92. Subgroup analyses indicated no significant diagnostic performance differences between ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI according to study design, type of LRT, most common etiology of liver disease, baseline lesion size, time of post-treated examination and MRI field strength (All P > 0.05).
Conclusion: ECA-MRI exhibited overall comparable diagnostic performance to EOB-MRI in assessing residual or recurrent HCC after LRT.
Keywords: Contrast agent; Diagnostic performance; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Locoregional therapies; Magnetic resonance imaging.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5134-5143. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35267090
-
Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging outperformed multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Liver Transpl. 2017 Dec;23(12):1505-1518. doi: 10.1002/lt.24867. Liver Transpl. 2017. PMID: 28886231
-
Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD014798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014798.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35521901 Free PMC article.
-
Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(32):e1157. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001157. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26266348 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23611316 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2018;67:358-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29086 - DOI - PubMed
-
- EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of hepatology. 2018;69:182-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 - DOI
-
- Llovet JM, De Baere T, Kulik L, Haber PK, Greten TF, Meyer T, Lencioni R. Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2021;18:293-313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-00395-0 - DOI
-
- Kulik L, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:477-91.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.065 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Youn SY, Kim B, Kim DH, Choi HJ, Sung PS, Choi JI. Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm predicts postsurgical recurrence in locoregional therapy-treated hepatocellular carcinoma. European radiology. 2022;32:6270-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08720-8 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical