Middle-aged and older people's preference for medical-elderly care integrated institutions in China: a discrete choice experiment study
- PMID: 38200515
- PMCID: PMC10777634
- DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01696-w
Middle-aged and older people's preference for medical-elderly care integrated institutions in China: a discrete choice experiment study
Abstract
Background: With the continuing impact of the aging population, medical-elderly care integrated institutions, as a way to bear the pressure of medical and elderly care, effectively ensure the quality of life of the elderly in their later years.
Objectives: To explore the preferences of medical-elderly care integrated institutions among Chinese middle-aged and older people and to provide a reference for establishing elderly-oriented development of medical-elderly care integrated institutions.
Methods: In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate the preferences of people aged 45 years and older in medical-elderly care integrated institutions in China from October 20, 2022, to November 10, 2022. A mixed logit regression model was used to analyze the DCE data. Participants' willingness to pay for each attribute was also calculated.
Results: Data from 420 participants who provided valid responses were included in the analysis. In terms of the choice preference, moderate service quality (vs. poor service quality: β = 1.707, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.343 ~ 2.071) and high medical technology level (vs. low medical technology level: β = 1.535, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.240 ~ 1.830) were the most important attributes to middle-aged and older people, followed by monthly cost, environmental facilities, the convenience of transportation, and entertainment activities. Regarding the willingness to pay, participants were more willing to pay for service quality and medical technology level than for other attributes. They were willing to pay $3156 and $2838 more for "poor service quality" and "low medical technology level," respectively, to receive "moderate service quality " (p = 0.007, 95% CI 963 ~ 5349) and "high medical technology level" (p = 0.005, 95% CI 852 ~ 4824).
Conclusions: The state should attach great importance to the development of medical-elderly care integrated services industry, actively optimize the model of the medical-elderly care integrated service, improve the facilities, and create a healthy environment. At the same time, give full play to the role of medical insurance, long-term care insurance, and commercial insurance, so as to improve the comprehensive quality of life of the elderly.
Public contribution: The design of the experimental selection was guided by 10 experts in the field, 5 Chinese government officials, and interviews and focus group discussions, without whose participation this study would not have been possible.
Keywords: Aging; Discrete Choice Experiment; Medical-Elderly Care Integrated Institutions; Middle-aged and Elderly People; Preferences; Quality of Life.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38692091
-
Preferences for home-based care services during China's long-term care market transition: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 17;25(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12853-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40380142 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment Preferences of Residents Assumed to Have Severe Chronic Diseases in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228420. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33203010 Free PMC article.
-
Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method.Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;10:1005453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005453. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36579068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preferences for public long-term care insurance among middle-aged and elderly residents: A discrete choice experiment in Hubei Province, China.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1050407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1050407. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36778541 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Balancing the Demands of Older People and Care Services of Healthy Aging: Assessment and Positioning of Care Facilities.Int J Public Health. 2025 Jun 30;70:1607249. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607249. eCollection 2025. Int J Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40662081 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial disparities of population aging in Shenzhen: from China's Hukou perspective.Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 4;13:1614007. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614007. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40832024 Free PMC article.
-
Compensation preferences of home-based disabled beneficiaries in the long-term care insurance system in Guangzhou, China.Health Policy Plan. 2025 May 9;40(5):556-565. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf015. Health Policy Plan. 2025. PMID: 40220141 Free PMC article.
-
The association between internet use and the choice of medical institution among Chinese older adults.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04994-3. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38907348 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial equity and factors that influence the distribution of elderly care institutions in China.Int J Health Geogr. 2025 Mar 4;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12942-025-00389-8. Int J Health Geogr. 2025. PMID: 40038664 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO, Aging. Overview. World Health Organization (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1 (accessed April 24, 2022).
-
- Wang X, Shi H, Lu G, et al. Application of tcm + smart elderly care in the medical-nursing care integration service system. J Sens. 2022;2022:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2022/5154528. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources