Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 4;12(1):121.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010121.

Social Media, Endometriosis, and Evidence-Based Information: An Analysis of Instagram Content

Affiliations

Social Media, Endometriosis, and Evidence-Based Information: An Analysis of Instagram Content

Hannah Adler et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Social media platforms are used for support and as resources by people from the endometriosis community who are seeking advice about diagnosis, education, and disease management. However, little is known about the scientific accuracy of information circulated on Instagram about the disease. To fill this gap, this study analysed the evidence-based nature of content on Instagram about endometriosis. A total of 515 Instagram posts published between February 2022 and April 2022 were gathered and analysed using a content analysis method, resulting in sixteen main content categories, including "educational", which comprised eleven subcategories. Claims within educational posts were further analysed for their evidence-based accuracy, guided by a process which included fact-checking all claims against the current scientific evidence and research. Of the eleven educational subcategories, only four categories (cure, scientific article, symptoms, and fertility) comprised claims that were at least 50% or greater evidence-based. More commonly, claims comprised varying degrees of evidence-based, mixed, and non-evidence-based information, and some categories, such as surgery, were dominated by non-evidence-based information about the disease. This is concerning as social media can impact real-life decision-making and management for individuals with endometriosis. Therefore, this study suggests that health communicators, clinicians, scientists, educators, and community groups trying to engage with the endometriosis online community need to be aware of social media discourses about endometriosis, while also ensuring that accurate and translatable information is provided.

Keywords: Instagram; advocacy; endometriosis; pelvic pain; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Cecilia Ng receives research funding from the Australian Federal Government, Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), is a former employee of CSL Vifor, and manages research funding outside the submitted work. Mathew Leonardi reports grants from Australian MRFF, AbbVie, CanSAGE, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hyivy, Pfizer; honoraria for lectures/writing from AIUM, GE Healthcare, Bayer, AbbVie, TerSera, consultancy work with Hologic, Chugai, Roche Diagnostics, AIMA, and affiliations with Imagendo, outside the submitted work. Mike Armour receives research funding from various philanthropic donors including the Wilson Foundation, the Victorian Government, Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), is a scientific advisory board member for Evolv Therapeutics, and is the chair of Endometriosis Australia’s Clinical Advisory Committee, outside the submitted work. Jason Abbott is the Chairman NECST network (MRFF funded), Endometriosis Advisory Group Member to Australian government, Chair of the Gynaecology group for MBS review Federal Government, and Chair of the expert endometriosis working group RANZCOG. He is also a FIGO member of the Menstrual Health and disorders group, on the steering committee for Endometriosis National Action Plan, Co-chair of the CCS for ACSQHC in HMB, Co Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Consultant/MAB for Hologic, Bayer, MSD, Stryker, Storz, Allergan, Vifor, Gideon Richter, and the former Medical Director and Chair, Endometriosis Australia, outside the submitted work. D.B. has received travel and expense grants and speaking fees from Myovant Sciences and Guerbet, outside of the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total number of posts per content category.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total number of posts per Educational and Information-Sharing content category.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shafrir A.L., Farland L.V., Shah D.K., Harris H.R., Kvaskoff M., Zondervan K., Missmer S.A. Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;51:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowlands I.J., Abbott J.A., Montgomery G.W., Hockey R., Rogers P., Mishra G.D. Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: A data linkage cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021;128:657–665. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16447. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armour M., Sinclair J., Ng C.H.M., Hyman M.S., Lawson K., Smith C.A., Abbott J. Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: An Australian survey. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73389-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Hara R., Rowe H., Fisher J. Managing endometriosis: A cross-sectional survey of women in Australia. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022;43:265–272. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2020.1825374. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leonardi M., Rocha R., Tun-Ismail A., Robledo K., Armour M., Condous G. Assessing the knowledge of endometriosis diagnostic tools in a large, international lay population: An online survey. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021;128:2084–2090. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16865. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources