Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):108.
doi: 10.3390/foods13010108.

Sensory Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat: Bridging the Gap with Animal Meat, Challenges and Future Prospects

Affiliations
Review

Sensory Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat: Bridging the Gap with Animal Meat, Challenges and Future Prospects

Swati Kumari et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Globally, the demand for plant-based meat is increasing rapidly as these products are becoming quite popular among vegans and vegetarians. However, its development is still in the early stage and faces various technological challenges; the imitation of the sensory profile of meat is the most challenging part as these products are meant to be an alternative to animal meat. The development of a product similar to meat requires accurate selection of ingredients and processing techniques. An understanding of the relevant sensory profile can help in constructing products and technologies that are consumer-centric and sustainable. In this review, we focus on the comparative differences in the sensory profiles of animal meat and plant-based meat alternatives, particularly regarding the color, texture, and flavor, along with the methods used to compare them. This paper also explains the sensory evaluation and how it affects consumer preference and acceptability. Additionally, a direction for further research on developing better plant-based meat products is suggested.

Keywords: animal meat; challenges; consumer acceptance; plant-based protein alternatives; sensory evaluation methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of natural plant-based alternative color profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of change in color (Red Beet) of plant-based patty. (A) Red Beet Pre-Cooking. (B) Red Beet Post-Cooking.

References

    1. Bartashus J. Plant-Based Foods Poised for Explosive Growth Report. Bloomberg Intelligence; New York, NY, USA: 2021.
    1. AlGarf D. Plant-Based Food Takeover. [(accessed on 28 February 2023)]. Available online: https://infomineo.com/agriculture/plant-based-food-takeover/
    1. Hu F.B., Otis B.O., McCarthy G. Can plant-based meat alternatives be part of a healthy and sustainable diet? JAMA. 2019;322:1547–1548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakhsh A., Lee S.-J., Lee E.-Y., Hwang Y.-H., Joo S.-T. Evaluation of rheological and sensory characteristics of plant-based meat analog with comparison to beef and pork. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021;41:983. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2021.e50. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pointke M., Albrecht E.H., Geburt K., Gerken M., Traulsen I., Pawelzik E. A comparative analysis of plant-based milk alternatives part 1: Composition, sensory, and nutritional value. Sustainability. 2022;14:7996. doi: 10.3390/su14137996. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources