Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Guiding Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in an Incontinent Patient without Suture Dehiscence
- PMID: 38201377
- PMCID: PMC10804317
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010068
Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Guiding Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in an Incontinent Patient without Suture Dehiscence
Abstract
We present the case of a 36-year-old primigravida who gave birth to a 3200 g baby by vacuum-assisted (Kiwi OmniCup™) operative vaginal delivery with mediolateral episiotomy. A "y"-shaped perineal tear with a grade IIIC obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was diagnosed and repaired. Two days after delivery, in the absence of suture dehiscence, she started experiencing complete anal incontinence. A decision was made in association with a proctologic surgeon for an early secondary repair. Before surgery, a Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) was performed. The exam revealed a major defect of the external anal sphincter at the 11 o'clock position. This allowed for the reopening of only a circumscribed area of the perineal suture and repair of the sphincters using the end-to-end technique. The symptoms regressed completely, and follow-up TPUS demonstrated the gradual wound healing process. Anal incontinence, secondary to obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), has a severe negative impact on women's quality of life. TPUS is an effective method to detect sphincter defects and monitor the healing process. This report investigates the feasibility of identifying the sphincter tear in an incontinent puerperal patient without suture dehiscence in order to target early secondary repair while minimizing its extent. TPUS has proven a safe and effective tool to guide early secondary repair of symptomatic OASI complications while minimizing the invasiveness of the procedure. Multidisciplinary management is crucial to ensure the adequate standard of care.
Keywords: 3D imaging; anal incontinence; early secondary repair; multidisciplinary management; obstetric anal sphincter injury; pelvic floor disorders; ultrasonography.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Is there a role for transperineal ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter immediately after primary repair of third degree tears?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.182. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022. PMID: 35255362
-
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process.BMC Womens Health. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01915-7. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35948903 Free PMC article.
-
How comparable is clinical grading of obstetric anal sphincter injury with that determined by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;56(4):618-623. doi: 10.1002/uog.22011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32149422
-
Diagnostic capabilities of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) to evaluate anal sphincter defect post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS)? A systematic review.J Ultrasound. 2023 Jun;26(2):393-399. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00763-3. Epub 2023 Jan 11. J Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 36630015 Free PMC article.
-
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30392991 Review. French.
References
-
- Hehir M.P., O’Connor H.D., Higgins S., Robson M.S., McAuliffe F.M., Boylan P.C., Malone F.D., Mahony R. Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, Risk Factors and Method of Delivery—An 8-Year Analysis across Two Tertiary Referral Centers. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1514–1516. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.791268. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources