Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):120.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010120.

A Sequent of Gram-Negative Co-Infectome-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Are Potentially Subtle Aggravators Associated to the SARS-CoV-2 Evolution of Virulence

Affiliations

A Sequent of Gram-Negative Co-Infectome-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Are Potentially Subtle Aggravators Associated to the SARS-CoV-2 Evolution of Virulence

Kamaleldin B Said et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the major problems in COVID-19 that is not well understood. ARDS is usually complicated by co-infections in hospitals. Although ARDS is inherited by Europeans and Africans, this is not clear for those from the Middle East. There are severe limitations in correlations made between COVID-19, ARDS, co-infectome, and patient demographics. We investigated 298 patients for associations of ARDS, coinfections, and patient demographics on COVID-19 patients' outcomes. Of the 149 patients examined for ARDS during COVID-19, 16 had an incidence with a higher case fatality rate (CFR) of 75.0% compared to those without ARDS (27.0%) (p value = 0.0001). The co-infectome association showed a CFR of 31.3% in co-infected patients; meanwhile, only 4.8% of those without co-infections (p value = 0.01) died. The major bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli, either alone or in a mixed infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of COVID-19 patients with and without ARDS revealed a significant difference in the survival time of patients with ARDS (58.8 +/- 2.7 days) and without ARDS (41.9 +/- 1.8 days) (p value = 0.0002). These findings prove that increased hospital time was risky for co-infectome-induced SDRS later on. This also explained that while empiric therapy and lethal ventilations delayed the mortality in 75% of patients, they potentially did not help those without co-infection or ARDS who stayed for shorter times. In addition, the age of patients (n = 298) was significantly associated with ARDS (72.9 +/- 8.9) compared to those without it (56.2 +/- 15.1) and was irrespective of gender. However, there were no significant differences neither in the age of admitted patients before COVID-19 (58.5 +/- 15.3) and during COVID-19 (57.2 +/- 15.5) nor in the gender and COVID-19 fatality (p value 0.546). Thus, Gram-negative co-infectome potentially induced fatal ARDS, aggravating the COVID-19 outcome. These findings are important for the specific differential diagnosis of patients with and without ARDS and co-infections. Future vertical investigations on mechanisms of Gram-negative-induced ARDS are imperative since hypervirulent strains are rapidly circulating. This study was limited as it was a single-center study confined to Ha'il hospitals; a large-scale investigation in major national hospitals would gain more insights.

Keywords: ARDS; COVID-19 fatality; co-evolution of virulence; co-infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of survival analysis in COVID-19 subjects with no ARDS versus those with it.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of survival analysis in COVID-19–ARDS patients with or without bacterial co-infection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of survival analysis in COVID-19 subjects with or without bacterial co-infection in subjects without ARDS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association of admitted patients’ age with ARDS incidence rates in the study population in Ha’il, Saudi Arabia.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of COVID-19 patients with and without ARDS.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ashbaugh D.G., Bigelow D.B., Petty T.L., Levine B.E. Acute Respiratory Distress in Adults. Lancet. 1967;290:319–323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90168-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranieri V.M., Rubenfeld G.D., Thompson B.T., Ferguson N.D., Caldwell E., Fan E., Camporota L., Slutsky A.S. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–2533. doi: 10.1001/JAMA.2012.5669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gajic O., Dabbagh O., Park P.K., Adesanya A., Chang S.Y., Hou P., Anderson H., Hoth J.J., Mikkelsen M.E., Gentile N.T., et al. Early Identification of Patients at Risk of Acute Lung Injury: Evaluation of Lung Injury Prediction Score in a Multicenter Cohort Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;183:462–470. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201004-0549OC. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Zhang L., Xi X., Zhou J.X. The Association Between Etiologies and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study. Front. Med. 2021;8:462–470. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.739596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L., Pelosi P., Suter P.M., Pedoto A., Vercesi P., Lissoni A. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Caused by Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Disease. Different Syndromes? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998;158:3–11. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9708031. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources