Addressing Genetic Tumor Heterogeneity, Post-Therapy Metastatic Spread, Cancer Repopulation, and Development of Acquired Tumor Cell Resistance
- PMID: 38201607
- PMCID: PMC10778239
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010180
Addressing Genetic Tumor Heterogeneity, Post-Therapy Metastatic Spread, Cancer Repopulation, and Development of Acquired Tumor Cell Resistance
Abstract
The concept of post-therapy metastatic spread, cancer repopulation and acquired tumor cell resistance (M-CRAC) rationalizes tumor progression because of tumor cell heterogeneity arising from post-therapy genetic damage and subsequent tissue repair mechanisms. Therapeutic strategies designed to specifically address M-CRAC involve tissue editing approaches, such as low-dose metronomic chemotherapy and the use of transcriptional modulators with or without targeted therapies. Notably, tumor tissue editing holds the potential to treat patients, who are refractory to or relapsing (r/r) after conventional chemotherapy, which is usually based on administering a maximum tolerable dose of a cytostatic drugs. Clinical trials enrolling patients with r/r malignancies, e.g., non-small cell lung cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis and acute myelocytic leukemia, indicate that tissue editing approaches could yield tangible clinical benefit. In contrast to conventional chemotherapy or state-of-the-art precision medicine, tissue editing employs a multi-pronged approach targeting important drivers of M-CRAC across various tumor entities, thereby, simultaneously engaging tumor cell differentiation, immunomodulation, and inflammation control. In this review, we highlight the M-CRAC concept as a major factor in resistance to conventional cancer therapies and discusses tissue editing as a potential treatment.
Keywords: M-CRAC; anakoinosis; drug repurposing; drug resistance; metastases; metronomic chemotherapy; pioglitazone; transcriptional modulation; tumor cell repopulation; tumor heterogeneity; tumor tissue editing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Shepherd J.H., Ballman K., Polley M.-Y.C., Campbell J.D., Fan C., Selitsky S., Fernandez-Martinez A., Parker J.S., Hoadley K.A., Hu Z., et al. CALGB 40603 (Alliance): Long-Term Outcomes and Genomic Correlates of Response and Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or Without Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JCO. 2022;40:1323–1334. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01506. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bethge W.A., Martus P., Schmitt M., Holtick U., Subklewe M., von Tresckow B., Ayuk F., Wagner-Drouet E.M., Wulf G.G., Marks R., et al. GLA/DRST real-world outcome analysis of CAR T-cell therapies for large B-cell lymphoma in Germany. Blood. 2022;140:349–358. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021015209. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gökbuget N., Zugmaier G., Dombret H., Stein A., Bonifacio M., Graux C., Faul C., Brüggemann M., Taylor K., Mergen N., et al. Curative outcomes following blinatumomab in adults with minimal residual disease B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2020;61:2665–2673. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1780583. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
