Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 30;16(1):191.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16010191.

Comparative Study of the Effect of Radiation Delivered by Lutetium-177 or Actinium-225 on Anti-GD2 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Viability and Functions

Affiliations

Comparative Study of the Effect of Radiation Delivered by Lutetium-177 or Actinium-225 on Anti-GD2 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Viability and Functions

Quaovi H Sodji et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been relatively ineffective against solid tumors. Low-dose radiation which can be delivered to multiple sites of metastases by targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) can elicit immunostimulatory effects. However, TRT has never been combined with CAR T cells against solid tumors in a clinical setting. This study investigated the effects of radiation delivered by Lutetium-177 (177Lu) and Actinium-225 (225Ac) on the viability and effector function of CAR T cells in vitro to evaluate the feasibility of such therapeutic combinations. After the irradiation of anti-GD2 CAR T cells with various doses of radiation delivered by 177Lu or 225Ac, their viability and cytotoxic activity against GD2-expressing human CHLA-20 neuroblastoma and melanoma M21 cells were determined by flow cytometry. The expression of the exhaustion marker PD-1, activation marker CD69 and the activating receptor NKG2D was measured on the irradiated anti-GD2 CAR T cells. Both 177Lu and 225Ac displayed a dose-dependent toxicity on anti-GD2 CAR T cells. However, radiation enhanced the cytotoxic activity of these CAR T cells against CHLA-20 and M21 irrespective of the dose tested and the type of radionuclide. No significant changes in the expression of PD-1, CD69 and NKG2D was noted on the CAR T cells following irradiation. Given a lower CAR T cell viability at equal doses and an enhancement of cytotoxic activity irrespective of the radionuclide type, 177Lu-based TRT may be preferred over 225Ac-based TRT when evaluating a potential synergism between these therapies in vivo against solid tumors.

Keywords: Actinium-225; Lutetium-177; chimeric antigen receptor; melanoma; neuroblastoma; targeted radionuclide therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Q.H.S. is an inventor on patent applications related to this publication. MHF is an inventor on patent applications related to this publication. D.C.: None; C.P.K.: None; L.S.: None; A.S.: None; D.A.: None; J.C.E.: None; I.M.O.: None; R.H. received patent royalties from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; consulting fees from Archeus Technologies Inc. and Monopar Therapeutics. J.W.: is the cofounder of Archeus Technologies, which owns the licensing rights to NM600 and related technologies and holds stock in Archeus; B.P.B. received stock/stock options from Voximetry Inc.; K.S. received grant supports from Synthego and Spotlight Therapeutics; patent royalties from Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; honoraria from ISCT, is an inventor on patent applications related to this publication; Scientific Advisory Board Member for Notch Therapeutics and Andson Biotech. P.M.S. received support from the University of Wisconsin, Midwest Athletes For Childhood Cancer and the National Cancer Institute. C.M.C. received honoraria from Bayer, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, WiCell Research Institute, consulting fees from Elephas and is an inventor on patent applications related to this publication. Z.S.M. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for Archeus Technologies, Seneca Therapeutics, and NorthStar Medical Isotopes; received royalties from patents held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; received stock/stock options from Archeus Technologies Scientific Advisory board and Seneca Therapeutics Scientific Advisory Board; received research support from Point Biopharma, Telix Pharmaceuticals and XRD Therapeutics and is an inventor on patent applications related to this publication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Third-generation virus-free CRISPR anti-GD2 CAR T cells. (A) Schematic of the domains of the third generation CAR. The extracellular domain includes the scFV (VH and VL chains connected by a linker) and a hinge. The intracellular domain is comprised of 2 costimulatory domains (CD28 and OX40) and a signaling domain (CD3-Zeta). These 2 domains are connected by a transmembrane domain (CD28 transmembrane domain). (B) Schematic of the third generation anti-GD2 CAR construct inserted into the human T cell receptor alpha constant gene (TRAC). (C) Schematic of the anti-GD2 CAR T cell used experimentally. It expresses the anti-GD2 CAR but is devoid of T cell receptor due to the CRISPR knockout of the human TRAC gene. scFv: single-chain variable fragment; VH: heavy chain; VL: light chain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose-dependent effect of 225Ac and 177Lu on the viability of anti-GD2 CAR T cells. (A) Experimental scheme: anti-GD2 CAR T cells were incubated in cell culture medium containing free 225Ac or 177Lu with activities calculated to deliver a radiation dose between 1 and 6 Gy by day 3. The CAR T cells were harvested, and their viability was analyzed by flow cytometry using a live/dead staining. Viable CAR T cells were determined as CD45+ and live/Dead-Ghost red-. (B) Both 225Ac and 177Lu led to a dose-dependent CAR T cell death. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons correction ** p = 0.0024; *** p = 0.0001; **** p < 0.0001. Each bar represents the mean (triplicate measurements) and error bar represents the standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose-independent effect of 225Ac and 177Lu on anti-GD2 CAR T cell cytotoxicity. (A) Experimental scheme: After irradiation of CAR T cells by 225Ac or 177Lu, the CAR T cells were harvested, washed and trypan blue viability assay was performed. The viable CAR T cells after irradiation were co-cultured with the GD2-expressing human neuroblastoma cell line CHLA-20 for 24 h at an E:T ratio of 10:1 (viable anti-GD2 CAR T cells: tumor cells). (B) The viability of the CHLA-20 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. The exposure of anti-GD2 CAR T cells to radiation delivered by radionuclide enhances their cytotoxicity against CHLA-20 cells to a similar degree for all doses tested for 225Ac or 177Lu. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons correction *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns: not significant. Each bar represents the mean (triplicate measurements), and the error bar represents the standard deviation. The cytotoxic activity of CAR T cells irradiated with 2 Gy of radiation delivered by 225Ac was not performed because of very low CAR T cell viability after irradiation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
225Ac or 177Lu does not impact the expression of exhaustion and activation markers on anti-GD2 CAR T cells. (A) Experimental scheme: anti-GD2 CAR T cells were incubated in cell culture medium containing 225Ac or 177Lu with activities calculated to deliver a radiation dose between 1 and 6 Gy by day 3. CAR T cells were harvested, and the expression of exhaustion and activation markers was analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) The expression of the exhaustion marker PD-1 does not change following irradiation by 225Ac or 177Lu. (C) Similarly, no major impact is seen on the expression of the T cell activation marker CD69. (D) Irradiation does not result in a major impact on the activation marker NKG2D. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons correction; ns: not significant. Each bar represents the mean (triplicate measurements), and the error bar represents the standard deviation. The effects of 2 Gy irradiation delivered by 225Ac on the receptors’ expression was not evaluated because of very low CAR T cell viability after irradiation. ns: not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. June C.H., O’Connor R.S., Kawalekar O.U., Ghassemi S., Milone M.C. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359:1361–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feins S., Kong W., Williams E.F., Milone M.C., Fraietta J.A. An introduction to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Am. J. Hematol. 2019;94:S3–S9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neelapu S.S., Locke F.L., Bartlett N.L., Lekakis L.J., Miklos D.B., Jacobson C.A., Braunschweig I., Oluwole O.O., Siddiqi T., Lin Y., et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:2531–2544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abramson J.S., Palomba M.L., Gordon L.I., Lunning M.A., Wang M., Arnason J., Mehta A., Purev E., Maloney D.G., Andreadis C., et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): A multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020;396:839–852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster S.J., Bishop M.R., Tam C.S., Waller E.K., Borchmann P., McGuirk J.P., Jäger U., Jaglowski S., Andreadis C., Westin J.R., et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:45–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources