Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 30;16(1):193.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16010193.

Limited Effects of Class II Transactivator-Based Immunotherapy in Murine and Human Glioblastoma

Affiliations

Limited Effects of Class II Transactivator-Based Immunotherapy in Murine and Human Glioblastoma

A Katherine Tan et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The major histocompatibility complex type II is downregulated in glioblastoma (GB) due to the silencing of the major transcriptional regulator class II transactivator (CIITA). We investigated the pro-immunogenic potential of CIITA overexpression in mouse and human GB.

Methods: The intracerebral growth of wildtype GL261-WT cells was assessed following contralateral injection of GL261-CIITA cells or flank injections with GL261-WT or GL261-CIITA cells. Splenocytes obtained from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT, GL261-CIITA cells or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were transferred to other mice and subsequently implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT. Human GB cells and (syngeneic) GB-infiltrating immune cells were isolated from surgical samples and co-cultured with GB cells expressing CIITA or not, followed by RT-qPCR assessment of the expression of key immune regulators.

Results: Intracerebral vaccination of GL261-CIITA significantly reduced the subsequent growth of GL261-WT cells implanted contralaterally. Vaccination with GL261-WT or -CIITA subcutaneously, however, equivalently retarded the intracerebral growth of GL261 cells. Adoptive cell transfer experiments showed a similar antitumor potential of lymphocytes harvested from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT or -CIITA. Human GB-infiltrating myeloid cells and lymphocytes were not activated when cultured with CIITA-expressing GB cells. Tumor-infiltrating NK cells remained mostly inactivated when in co-culture with GB cells, regardless of CIITA.

Conclusion: these results question the therapeutic potential of CIITA-mediated immunotherapy in glioblastoma.

Keywords: class II transactivator; glioblastoma; natural killer cells; tumor microenvironment; tumor-associated macrophages; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Set up of experiment. (b) Coronal brain slices of mice after the experiment. (c) Direct intracranial injection of GL261-wildtype or -CIITA cells in C57Bl/6 mice. The bargraph represents the mean ± SD. (d) Survival curve of mice after direct i.c. injection with GL261-WT or -CIITA. Survival was significantly longer after injection with GL261-CIITA. (e) Set up of intracerebral contralateral vaccination experiment. (f) Coronal brain slices of mice after the vaccination experiment. The dashed line depicts the tumor engraftment after (*) PBS or (**) GL261-CIITA vaccination in the contralateral hemisphere. (g) The bargraph represents the mean ± SD after GL261-CIITA vaccination PBS vaccination. Abbreviations: I.c. = intracranial. WT = wildtype. ACT = Adoptive Cell Transfer. PBS = Phosphate Buffered Saline. * p < 0.05. *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Technical set up of peripheral vaccination experiment. (b) Representative images of coronal brain slices. (c) Bargraph, representing mean, SD and separate datapoints (orange). ANOVA p = 0.045. (d) Set-up of peripheral vaccination experiment. (e) Survival curve, representing survival of mice injected intracerebrally with GL261-WT and subsequently injected with splenocytes that were primed with either GL261-WT, -CIITA or PBS (sham-vaccinated). Abbreviations: S.c. = subcutanetous (injection). I.c. = intracranial (injection). WT = wildtype. PBS = Phosphate Buffered Saline. m = micrometer. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Phenotypic changes after co-culturing tumor-associated macrophages with U87-CIITA or -wildtype cells versus U87 monocultures. Scale bar in white: 100 micrometer, the same scale for all images. (bd) Gene expression of the indicated genes was determined by qPCR. Each bar represents the mean ± SD relative gene expression. * p < 0.05, ** p = 0.01. (b) Gene expression in tumor-associated macrotphages after co-culture with U87 glioblastoma cells and in monoculture. (c) Gene expression in tumor-infiltrating NK-cells after co-culture with U87 (c1) and GM2 (c2). (d) Gene expression of genes expressed in tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (d1) and of CD155 expressed in tumor cells (d2). Abbreviations: TAM = tumor-associated myeloid cells. NK = Natural Killer cell. TIL = Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. WT = wildtype. CC = co-cultured.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Survival curve of patients with glioblastoma with low (<25%) or high (>24%) CIITA or (b) HLA-DRa expression. (c) Two representative images of TMA with glioblastoma cells with high or no CIITA-expression. (d) Correlation between HLA-DRa expression and CIITA expression in glioblastoma. Using Gepia.cancer.pku online software, we calculated Kaplan meier curves for CIITA (e) and HLA-DRa (f) expression in patients with glioblastoma of TGCA cancer atlas. (g) Correlation between HLA-DRa and CIITA expression in glioblastoma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., von Deimling A., Figarella-Branger D., Cavenee W.K., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O.D., Kleihues P., Ellison D.W. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Weller M., Fisher B., Taphoorn M.J.B., Belanger K., Brandes A.A., Marosi C., Bogdahn U., et al. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:987–996. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R., Hegi M.E., Mason W.P., van den Bent M.J., Taphoorn M.J., Janzer R.C., Ludwin S.K., Allgeier A., Fisher B., Belanger K., et al. Effects of Radiotherapy with Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide versus Radiotherapy Alone on Survival in Glioblastoma in a Randomised Phase III Study: 5-Year Analysis of the EORTC-NCIC Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R., Taillibert S., Kanner A., Read W., Steinberg D.M., Lhermitte B., Toms S., Idbaih A., Ahluwalia M.S., Fink K., et al. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma. JAMA. 2017;318:2306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jakovlevs A., Vanags A., Gardovskis J., Strumfa I. Molecular Classification of Diffuse Gliomas. Pol. J. Pathol. 2019;70:246–258. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2019.93126. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources