Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 24;16(1):63.
doi: 10.3390/polym16010063.

Fabrication and Performance of Continuous 316 Stainless Steel Fibre-Reinforced 3D-Printed PLA Composites

Affiliations
Review

Fabrication and Performance of Continuous 316 Stainless Steel Fibre-Reinforced 3D-Printed PLA Composites

Alison J Clarke et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of 3D printing continuous stainless steel fibre-reinforced polymer composites. The printing study was carried out using 316L stainless steel fibre (SSF) bundles with an approximate diameter of 0.15 mm. This bundle was composed of 90 fibres with a 14 μm diameter. This fibre bundle was first coated with polylactic acid (PLA) in order to produce a polymer-coated continuous stainless steel filament, with diameters tailored in the range from 0.5 to 0.9 mm. These filaments were then used to print composite parts using the material extrusion (MEX) technique. The SSF's volume fraction (Vf) was controlled in the printed composite structures in the range from 4 to 30 Vf%. This was facilitated by incorporating a novel polymer pressure vent into the printer nozzle, which allowed the removal of excess polymer. This thus enabled the control of the metal fibre content within the printed composites as the print layer height was varied in the range from 0.22 to 0.48 mm. It was demonstrated that a lower layer height yielded a more homogeneous distribution of steel fibres within the PLA polymer matrix. The PLA-SSF composites were assessed to evaluate their mechanical performance, volume fraction, morphology and porosity. Composite porosities in the range of 2-21% were obtained. Mechanical testing demonstrated that the stainless steel composites exhibited a twofold increase in interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) and a fourfold increase in its tensile strength compared with the PLA-only polymer prints. When comparing the 4 and 30 Vf% composites, the latter exhibited a significant increase in both the tensile strength and modulus. The ILSS values obtained for the steel composites were up to 28.5 MPa, which is significantly higher than the approximately 13.8 MPa reported for glass fibre-reinforced PLA composites.

Keywords: 3D printing; mechanical properties; thermoplastic polymers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stainless steel fibre bundle: (a) spool and (b) 90 fibres per bundle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of 3devo filament making. (a) Schematic with the fibre introduction region indicated by the blue dashed ovals. (b) Photograph of the PLA-SSF filament co-extrusion. (c) Velocity and shearing profile of a non-Newtonian polymer-fibre co-extrusion die.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photograph of the printing head with an insert showing a schematic of the 1 mm in diameter polymer pressure vent (arrow), which facilitated the removal of excess polymer during printing. Note also the 4.5 mm flat area on the print head, which was found to facilitate ‘ironing’ of the part during printing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Three-dimensional printing continuous PLA-SSF composite. (a) Geometry shape trial prints. (b) Close-up of PLA-SSF continuous 3D printing path. (c) Tensile sample printed at a layer height of 0.22 mm, (10 mm scale bar).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cross-section SEM images of PLA-SSF filaments mounted in resin: (a) 0.7 mm PLA-SSF filament and (b) 0.5 mm PLA-SSF filament. Note the greater dispersion of fibres in the bundle for the filament with the smaller diameter.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The μCT scans of PLA-SSF 3D-printed part cross-sections (scale bar = 550 μm). (a) Printing head travel path, with uneven perimeters of the 0.35 mm layer height samples. (b) Printing head travel path, with even perimeters of the 0.22 mm layer height samples. (c) Composite (12 Vf%) printed with layer height of 0.35 mm. (d) Composite (30 Vf%) printed with layer height of 0.22 mm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
SEM cross-section image of the PLA-SSF composite matrix printed using a 0.22 mm layer height, demonstrating good diffusion of the PLA between the fibres in the SSF bundle.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Interlaminar shear strength results for the PLA 0.22, 0.35 and 0.48 mm layer height prints, along with the results reported in the literature for PLA-glass fibres (cGF) and a PLA-Basalt composite investigated in a previous study at UCD (not reported) [32].
Figure 9
Figure 9
Interlaminar shear strength results for the 0.22, 0.35 and 0.48 mm layer heights investigated with statistical analysis.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Examination of PLA-SSF composites after ILSS testing. (a) Fractured composite printed with a layer height of 0.35 mm, indicating interlaminar shearing and tensile fracture. The yellow dashed square indicates the region at higher magnification in (b). (b) The fibre pull-out and necking for this sample given in a higher magnification. (c,d) Corresponding images for a composite printed with a layer height of 0.22 mm, demonstrating similar fracturing along with fibre pull-out and SSF necking. The dashed blue square in (c) indicates the higher magnification image in (d).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Tensile properties of PLA composite samples printed at the four print head heights in this study (purple squares), with examples of metal- and carbon fibre-reinforced composites reported in the literature [17,19,20,30,33,36,41,44,64].
Figure 12
Figure 12
SEM images of PLA-SSF composite (35 mm layer height) after tensile testing. The image on the right is a higher magnification of the region in the purple box in the left image.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NatureWorks . Ingeo™ Biopolymer 3D850 Technical Data Sheet 3D Printing Monofilament—General Purpose Grade. NatureWorks LLC; Fridley, MN, USA: 2018. Technical Report 4.
    1. Luo M., Tian X., Shang J., Yun J., Zhu W., Li D., Qin Y. Bi-scale interfacial bond behaviors of CCF/PEEK composites by plasma-laser cooperatively assisted 3D printing process. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020;131:105812. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105812. - DOI
    1. Dutra T., Ferreira R.T.L., Resende H. Interlaminar shear strength of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites manufactured by 3D printing; Proceedings of the 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering; Lisbon, Portugal. 17–19 September 2018; - DOI
    1. Xu X., Mi G., Luo Y., Jiang P., Shao X., Wang C. Morphologies, microstructures, and mechanical properties of samples produced using laser metal deposition with 316 L stainless steel wire. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2017;94:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.02.008. - DOI
    1. Bhandari S., Lopez-Anido R.A., Gardner D.J. Enhancing the interlayer tensile strength of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PETG and PLA composites via annealing. Addit. Manuf. 2019;30:100922. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100922. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources