Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):300.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13010300.

Building Bridges between People with Stroke, Families, and Health Professionals: Development of a Blended Care Program for Self-Management

Carla Mendes Pereira  1   2 , Mara Matos  1 , Daniel Carvalho  3 , Patricia Macedo  4   5 , José M Calheiros  6 , Janice Alves  7 , Luís Paulino Ferreira  8 , Teresa L Dias  1 , Rui Neves Madeira  4   9 , Fiona Jones  10
Affiliations

Building Bridges between People with Stroke, Families, and Health Professionals: Development of a Blended Care Program for Self-Management

Carla Mendes Pereira et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Evidence-informed interventions for stroke self-management support can influence functional capability and social participation. People with stroke should be offered self-management support after hospital discharge. However, in Portugal, there are no known programs of this nature. This study aimed to develop a person-centered and tailored blended care program for post-stroke self-management, taking into account the existing evidence-informed interventions and the perspectives of Portuguese people with stroke, caregivers, and health professionals. An exploratory sequential mixed methods approach was used, including qualitative methods during stakeholder consultation (stage 1) and co-production (stage 2) and quantitative assessment during prototyping (stage 3). After ethical approval, recruitment occurred in three health units. Results from a literature search led to the adaptation of the Bridges Stroke Self-Management Program. In stage one, 47 participants were interviewed, with two themes emerging: (i) Personalized support and (ii) Building Bridges through small steps. In stage two, the ComVida program was developed, combining in-person and digital approaches, supported by a workbook and a mobile app. In stage three, 56 participants evaluated prototypes, demonstrating a strong level of quality. Understandability and actionability of the developed tools obtained high scores (91-100%). The app also showed good usability (A-grade) and high levels of recommendation (5 stars).

Keywords: change behavior; co-production; eHealth; mHealth; quality; self-efficacy; self-management; stroke; usability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.M.P., M.M., D.C., J.M.C., J.A., P.M., R.N.M., T.L.D. and L.P.F. declare no conflicts of interest. F.J. is founding director and CEO of Bridges Self-Management, a social enterprise run in partnership with St Georges University of London and Kingston University, conducting research and training in self-management support in health and social care. F.J.’s research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of the study stages. Wb = workbook; mApp = mobile app; PEMAT-P = Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool—for Printable materials; PEMAT-AV = Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool—for Audiovisual materials; uMARS = Mobile App Rating Scale-user version; SUS = System Usability Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Thematic analysis: themes and sub-themes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustrative examples of the ComVida workbook. (a) Cover of the workbook; (b) Peers stories: the story of Ana, 46, who suffered a stroke that affected her balance (chapter 1); (c) Common questions and tips: “how to socialize again?”, including strategies people with stroke found useful (chapter 2); (d) Hopes and ideas, giving examples and space for people to write their hopes for the future (chapter 3); (e) Small steps and taking action: set goals (chapter 4); and (f) Looking back: with a list of achievements that have worked for Diana (chapter 5).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshots of the ComVida app. (a) Front page of the app; (b) testimonials page; (c) glossary page; (d) goals page; and (e) notifications.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Violin plots of uMARS subdomains of objective quality of the ComVida app.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feigin V.L., Stark B.A., Johnson C.O., Roth G.A., Bisignano C., Abady G.G., Abbasifard M., Abbasi-Kangevari M., Abd-Allah F., Abedi V., et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Stroke and Its Risk Factors, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkins E., Wilson L., Wickramasinghe K., Bhatnagar P., Leal J., Luengo-Fernandez R., Burns R., Rayner M., Townsend N. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. European Heart Network Brussels; Brusells, Belgium: 2017.
    1. Chen T., Zhang B., Deng Y., Fan J.C., Zhang L., Song F. Long-Term Unmet Needs after Stroke: Systematic Review of Evidence from Survey Studies. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Della Vecchia C., Viprey M., Haesebaert J., Termoz A., Giroudon C., Dima A., Rode G., Préau M., Schott A.M. Contextual Determinants of Participation after Stroke: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021;43:1786–1798. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1679897. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen L., Xiao L.D., Chamberlain D., Newman P. Enablers and Barriers in Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care for Stroke Survivors and Caregivers: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2021;30:2786–2807. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15807. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources