Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 28;25(1):449.
doi: 10.3390/ijms25010449.

Molecular Testing for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis

Alevtina M Savicheva  1
Affiliations
Review

Molecular Testing for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis

Alevtina M Savicheva. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Previously established diagnostic approaches for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV), such as the Amsel criteria or the Nugent scoring system, do not always correspond to modern trends in understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of polymicrobial conditions. Inter-examiner variability and interpretation of data complicate the wet mount microscopy method. Gram staining of smears does not always provide reliable information regarding bacterial taxa, biofilms, or vaginal dysbiosis. Therefore, the introduction of molecular techniques into clinical practice is extremely relevant. Molecular approaches allow not only the diagnosis of BV but also provide an assessment of microbial composition, which is especially important in the differential diagnosis of vaginal infections. The current review represents an expert opinion on BV diagnosis and is based on extensive experience in the field of vaginal infection diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords: bacterial vaginosis; diagnosis; fluorescence in situ hybridization; real-time PCR; vaginal microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Radzinsky E.V., Savicheva A.M., Vorobyev S.V., Spasibova E.V., Shalepo K.V., Budilovskaya O.V., Khusnutdinova T.A., Krysanova A.A., Gushin A.E., Raevskaya O.A., et al. Vaginal biocenosis. StatusPraesens; Moscow, Russia: 2023. p. 360.
    1. Pandya S., Ravi K., Srinivas V., Jadhav S., Khan A., Arun A., Riley L.W., Madhivanan P. Comparison of culture-dependent and culture-independent molecular methods for characterization of vaginal microflora. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017;66:149–153. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Munckhof E.H.A., van Sitter R.L., Boers K.E., Lamont R.F., Te Witt R., le Cessie S., Knetsch C.W., van Doorn L.J., Quint W.G.V., Molijn A., et al. Comparison of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture and two CE-IVD marked quantitative real-time PCRs with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;38:959–966. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03538-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swidsinski S., Swidsinski A.V., Savicheva A.M., Gushchin A.E. Pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: Expanding knowledge and therapeutic possibilities. StatusPraesens Gynecol. Obstet. Infert. Marriage. 2023;3:39–46.
    1. Amsel R., Totten P.A., Spiegel C.A., Chen K.C.S., Eschenbach D., Holmes K.K. Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983;74:14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources