Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;11(2):859-870.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14643. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

Long-term outcomes and reverse remodelling in recently diagnosed unexplained left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Affiliations

Long-term outcomes and reverse remodelling in recently diagnosed unexplained left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Petr Kuchynka et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: In patients with recently diagnosed non-ischaemic LV systolic dysfunction, left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) and favourable prognosis has been documented in studies with short-term follow-up. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term clinical course and stability of LVRR in these patients.

Methods and results: We prospectively studied 133 patients (37 women; 55 [interquartile range 46, 61] years) with recently diagnosed unexplained LV systolic dysfunction, with heart failure symptoms lasting <6 months and LV ejection fraction <40% persisting after at least 1 week of therapy. All patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) at the time of diagnosis and serial echocardiographic and clinical follow-up over 5 years. LVRR was defined as the combined presence of (1) LVEF ≥ 50% or increase in LVEF ≥ 10% points and (2) decrease in LV end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDi) ≥ 10% or (3) LVEDDi ≤ 33 mm/m2. LVRR was observed in 46% patients at 1 year, in 60% at 2 years and 50% at 5 years. Additionally, 2% of patients underwent heart transplantation and 12% experienced heart failure hospitalization. During 5-year follow-up, 23 (17%) of the study cohort died. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were baseline right atrial size (OR 1.097, CI 1.007-1.196), logBNP level (OR 2.02, CI 1.14-3.56), and PR interval (OR 1.02, CI 1.006-1.035) (P < 0.05 for all). The number of macrophages on EMB was associated with overall survival in univariate analysis only. LVRR at 1 year of follow-up was associated with a lower rate of mortality and heart failure hospitalization (P = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of LVRR were left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (OR 0.97, CI 0.946-0.988), LVEF (OR 0.89, CI 0.83-0.96), and diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08) (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions: LVRR occurs in over half of patients with recent onset unexplained LV systolic dysfunction during first 2 years of optimally guided heart failure therapy and then remains relatively stable during 5-year follow-up. Normalization of adverse LV remodelling corresponds to a low rate of mortality and heart failure hospitalizations during long-term follow-up.

Keywords: Dilated cardiomyopathy; Endomyocardial biopsy; Left ventricular systolic dysfunction; Mortality; Reverse remodelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival without heart failure (HF) hospitalization or transplantation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) stratified by gender during follow‐up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in indexed left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDDi) stratified by gender during follow‐up.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival without heart failure (HF) hospitalization for patients with and without left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR).

References

    1. Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, Bilinska Z, Cecchi F, Charron P, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: A position statement from the European society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 2008;29:270‐276. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm342 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, Antzelevitch C, Corrado D, Arnett D, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation 2006;113:1807‐1816. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nijst P, Martens P, Mullens W. Heart failure with myocardial recovery ‐ The patient whose heart failure has improved: what next? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2017;60:226‐236. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Merlo M, Pyxaras SA, Pinamonti B, Barbati G, Di Lenarda A, Sinagra G. Prevalence and prognostic significance of left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy receiving tailored medical treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1468‐1476. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zou CH, Zhang J, Zhang YH, Wei BQ, Wu XF, Zhou Q, et al. Frequency and predictors of normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction in recent‐onset nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1705‐1710. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.028 - DOI - PubMed