Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 22:16:342-352.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.09.020. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Nonelective coronary artery bypass graft outcomes are adversely impacted by Coronavirus disease 2019 infection, but not altered processes of care: A National COVID Cohort Collaborative and National Surgery Quality Improvement Program analysis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Nonelective coronary artery bypass graft outcomes are adversely impacted by Coronavirus disease 2019 infection, but not altered processes of care: A National COVID Cohort Collaborative and National Surgery Quality Improvement Program analysis

Emily A Grimsley et al. JTCVS Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The effects of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and altered processes of care on nonelective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes remain unknown. We hypothesized that patients with COVID-19 infection would have longer hospital lengths of stay and greater mortality compared with COVID-negative patients, but that these outcomes would not differ between COVID-negative and pre-COVID controls.

Methods: The National COVID Cohort Collaborative 2020-2022 was queried for adult patients undergoing CABG. Patients were divided into COVID-negative, COVID-active, and COVID-convalescent groups. Pre-COVID control patients were drawn from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adjusted analysis of the 3 COVID groups was performed via generalized linear models.

Results: A total of 17,293 patients underwent nonelective CABG, including 16,252 COVID-negative, 127 COVID-active, 367 COVID-convalescent, and 2254 pre-COVID patients. Compared to pre-COVID patients, COVID-negative patients had no difference in mortality, whereas COVID-active patients experienced increased mortality. Mortality and pneumonia were higher in COVID-active patients compared to COVID-negative and COVID-convalescent patients. Adjusted analysis demonstrated that COVID-active patients had higher in-hospital mortality, 30- and 90-day mortality, and pneumonia compared to COVID-negative patients. COVID-convalescent patients had a shorter length of stay but a higher rate of renal impairment.

Conclusions: Traditional care processes were altered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data show that nonelective CABG in patients with active COVID-19 is associated with significantly increased rates of mortality and pneumonia. The equivalent mortality in COVID-negative and pre-COVID patients suggests that pandemic-associated changes in processes of care did not impact CABG outcomes. Additional research into optimal timing of CABG after COVID infection is warranted.

Keywords: COVID-19; nonelective coronary artery bypass grafting; outcomes; pandemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
None
Patient selection criteria from the N3C and NSQIP datasets.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection criteria from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) and National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) datasets. CABG, Coronary artery bypass grafting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of nonelective coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. CABG, Coronary artery bypass grafting.
None

Similar articles

References

    1. D'Urbano F., Fabbri N., Koleva Radica M., Rossin E., Carcoforo P. Emergency surgery in COVID-19 outbreak: has anything changed? Single center experience. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8:3691–3696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. COVIDSurg Collaborative Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1097–1103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horton R. Offline: COVID-19 and the NHS — “a national scandal”. Lancet. 2020;395:1022. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciarleglio F.A., Rigoni M., Mereu L., Tommaso C., Carrara A., Malossini G., et al. The negative effects of COVID-19 and national lockdown on emergency surgery morbidity due to delayed access. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLean R.C., Young J., Musbahi A., Lee J.X., Hidayat H., Abdalla N., et al. A single-centre observational cohort study to evaluate volume and severity of emergency general surgery admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: is there a “lockdown” effect? Int J Surg. 2020;83:259–266. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources