Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 7;5(12):891-903.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.001. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing

Affiliations
Review

Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing

Benjamin J W Chow et al. CJC Open. .

Abstract

Chest pain/discomfort (CP) is a common symptom and can be a diagnostic dilemma for many clinicians. The misdiagnosis of an acute or progressive chronic cardiac etiology may carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes the different options and modalities for establishing the diagnosis and severity of coronary artery disease. An effective test selection algorithm should be individually tailored to each patient to maximize diagnostic accuracy in a timely fashion, determine short- and long-term prognosis, and permit implementation of evidence-based treatments in a cost-effective manner. Through collaboration, a decision algorithm was developed (www.chowmd.ca/cadtesting) that could be adopted widely into clinical practice.

La douleur ou la gêne thoracique sont des symptômes fréquents qui peuvent poser un dilemme diagnostique pour de nombreux médecins. Les erreurs de diagnostic d’une cause aiguë ou chronique progressive d’origine cardiaque peuvent d'ailleurs entraîner un risque considérable de morbidité et de mortalité. La présente synthèse porte sur les différentes options et modalités d’établissement du diagnostic et de la gravité d’une coronaropathie. Un algorithme efficace pour le choix des tests doit être adapté à chaque patient afin de maximiser l’exactitude diagnostique dans les plus brefs délais, de déterminer le pronostic à court et à long terme, et de permettre une mise en œuvre de traitements fondés sur des données probantes tout en tenant compte des coûts. Un algorithme décisionnel a donc été conjointement mis au point (www.chowmd.ca/cadtesting) et pourrait être largement adopté dans la pratique clinique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2021. Cardiovascular Diseases.
    1. Diamond G., Forrester J. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–1358. - PubMed
    1. Chaitman B.R., Bourassa M.G., Davis K., et al. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS) Circulation. 1981;64:360–367. - PubMed
    1. Mancini G.B., Gosselin G., Chow B., et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of stable ischemic heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:837–849. - PubMed
    1. Fraker T.D., Jr., Fihn S.D., et al. Chronic Stable Angina Writing Committee. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines writing group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2264–2274. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources