Understanding Canadians' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use: Results from public opinion research
- PMID: 38205428
- PMCID: PMC10779429
- DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v48i1112a08
Understanding Canadians' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use: Results from public opinion research
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a current and pressing issue in Canada. Population-level antibiotic consumption is a key driver. The Public Health Agency of Canada undertook a comprehensive assessment of the Canadian public's knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic use, to help inform the implementation of public awareness and knowledge mobilization.
Methods: Data were collected in three phases: 1) six in-person focus groups (53 participants) to help frame the survey; 2) nationwide survey administration to 1,515 Canadians 18 years and older via cell phone and landline; and 3) 12 online focus groups to analyze survey responses. Survey data is descriptive.
Results: A third (33.9%) of survey respondents reported using antibiotics at least once in the previous 12 months, 15.8% more than twice and 4.6% more than five times. Antibiotic use was reported more among 1) those with a household income below $60,000, 2) those with a medical condition, 3) those without a university education and 4) among the youngest adults (18-24 years of age) and (25-34 years of age). Misinformation about antibiotics was common: 32.5% said antibiotics "can kill viruses"; 27.9% said they are "effective against colds and flu"; and 45.8% said they are "effective in treating fungal infections". Inaccurate information was reported more often by those 1) aged 18-24 years, 2) with a high school degree or less and 3) with a household income below $60,000. In focus groups, the time/money trade-offs involved in accessing medical care were reported to contribute to pushing for a prescription or using unprescribed antibiotics, particularly in more remote contexts, while the cost of a prescription contributed to sharing and using old antibiotics. A large majority, across all demographic groups, followed the advice of medical professionals in making health decisions.
Conclusion: High trust in medical professionals presents an important opportunity for knowledge mobilization. Delayed prescriptions may alleviate concerns about the time/money constraints of accessing future care. Consideration should be given to prioritizing access to appropriate diagnostic and other technology for northern and/or remote communities and/or medical settings serving many young children to alleviate concerns of needing a prescription or of needing to return later.
Keywords: Canada; antibiotic resistance; antibiotic use; antimicrobial resistance; public opinion; survey.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests None.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Public understanding and use of antibiotics in England: findings from a household survey in 2017.BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 28;9(10):e030845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030845. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31662380 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic use and resistance: a cross-sectional study exploring knowledge and attitudes among school and institution personnel in Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia.BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 29;8:495. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1477-1. BMC Res Notes. 2015. PMID: 26420302 Free PMC article.
-
Surveys of public knowledge and attitudes with regard to antibiotics in Poland: Did the European Antibiotic Awareness Day campaigns change attitudes?PLoS One. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172146. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28212400 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing inappropriate use of antibiotics: Findings from a nationwide survey of the general public in Malaysia.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0258698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258698. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34669733 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing public attitudes, knowledge, beliefs and behaviours towards antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in Australia, United Kingdom, and Sweden (2010-2021): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparative policy analysis.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0261917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261917. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35030191 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and correlates of oral antibiotic use in Canada.Can Commun Dis Rep. 2024 Sep 5;50(9):312-325. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v50i09a04. eCollection 2024 Sep. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2024. PMID: 39262453 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians', pharmacists', and nurses' education of patients about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in primary care settings: a qualitative systematic literature review.Front Antibiot. 2025 Jan 9;3:1507868. doi: 10.3389/frabi.2024.1507868. eCollection 2024. Front Antibiot. 2025. PMID: 39850331 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Council of Canadian Academies. When Antibiotics Fail. Ottawa: The Expert Panel on the Potential Socio-Economic Impacts of Antimicrobial Resistance in Canada. Ottawa, ON: CAA; 2019. https://cca-reports.ca/reports/the-potential-socio-economic-impacts-of-a...
-
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadians’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour on Pathogens and Infection Control: Final Report. Ottawa, ON: PHAC; 2008. https://books.google.ca/books/about/Canadians_Knowledge_Attitudes_and_Be...
-
- Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) – Rapid Response January to June 2018 – Antibiotic Medication Use. Ottawa, ON: StatCan; (modified 2018). https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3Instr.pl?Function=assembleInstr&Item_...
-
- Government of Canada. Standards for Conduct of Government of Canada Public Opinion Research—Telephone surveys. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; (modified 2020). https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/rop-por/telephone-eng.html