Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;34(10):883-894.
doi: 10.1177/10497323231217601. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Exploring the Methodological Benefits and Challenges of Utilising a Photovoice Methodology With Individuals in Recovery From Problem Substance Use

Affiliations

Exploring the Methodological Benefits and Challenges of Utilising a Photovoice Methodology With Individuals in Recovery From Problem Substance Use

Emma Smith et al. Qual Health Res. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Photovoice is a type of visual research method which supports participants to reflect upon their experiences by capturing digital images. It is a methodology that is routinely used with groups that could be considered vulnerable, as a way of allowing participants to tell their stories for themselves. This article details the process of conducting a Photovoice study with individuals in recovery from problem substance use and reflects on the methodological benefits and challenges of utilising a visual research methodology with this population. Researchers wishing to conduct a Photovoice study with individuals in recovery should be mindful of striking a delicate balance between respecting an individual's autonomy and ensuring their wellbeing. Although ethically complex, Photovoice is an ideal method for research with this population as it allows participants to convey meaning and introduce narratives for themselves in an engaging way.

Keywords: Photovoice; participatory action research; recovery; substance use; visual research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abma T., Breed M., Lips S., Schrijver J. (2022). Whose voice is it really? Ethics of Photovoice with children in health promotion. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21(1), 1–10. 10.1177/16094069211072419 - DOI
    1. Anderson K., Elder-Robinson E., Howard K., Garvey G. (2023). A systematic methods review of Photovoice research with indigenous young people. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(1), 160940692311720. 10.1177/16094069231172076 - DOI
    1. Baker T. A., Wang C. C. (2006). Photovoice: Use of a participatory action research method to explore the chronic pain experience in older adults. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1405–1413. 10.1177/1049732306294118 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baum F., MacDougall C., Smith D. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(10), 854–857. 10.1136/jech.2004.028662 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becot F. A., Inwood S. M., Buchanan E. A. (2023). Navigating the ethical and methodological dimensions of a farm safety Photovoice project. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 20(2), 249–263. 10.1007/s11673-023-10261-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed