Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;34(8):5360-5369.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10567-6. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Reproducibility and accuracy of vessel wall MRI in diagnosing giant cell arteritis: a study with readers of varying expertise

Jérôme El Haddad  1 , Frédérique Charbonneau  2 , Jessica Guillaume  3 , Gaëlle Clavel  4 , Thibaud Chazal  4 , Guillaume Poillon  2 , Alexia Tran  2 , Alexandre Niro  2 , Rémi Sore  2 , Luca Litman-Roventa  2 , Kévin Mahe  2 , Samantha Chhour  2 , Julien Savatovsky  2 , Augustin Lecler  5
Affiliations

Reproducibility and accuracy of vessel wall MRI in diagnosing giant cell arteritis: a study with readers of varying expertise

Jérôme El Haddad et al. Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) in diagnosing giant cell arteritis (GCA) among groups of radiologists with varying levels of expertise.

Methods: This institutional review board-approved retrospective single-center study recruited patients with suspected GCA between December 2014 and September 2021. Patients underwent 3 -T VW-MRI before temporal artery biopsy. Ten radiologists with varying levels of expertise, blinded to all data, evaluated several intracranial and extracranial arteries to assess GCA diagnosis. Interobserver reproducibility and diagnostic performance were evaluated.

Results: Fifty patients (27 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 75.9 ± 9 years were included. Thirty-one of 50 (62%) had a final diagnosis of GCA.VW-MRI had an almost perfect reproducibility among expert readers (kappa = 0.93; 95% CI 0.77-1) and substantial reproducibility among all readers, junior and non-expert senior readers (kappa = 0.7; 95% CI 0.66-0.73; kappa = 0.67 95% CI 0.59-0.74; kappa = 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.88 respectively) when diagnosing GCA. Substantial interobserver agreement was observed for the frontal branch of superficial temporal artery. Moderate interobserver agreement was observed for the superficial temporal artery and its parietal branch, as well as ophthalmic arteries in all groups of readers. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy varied depending on the group of readers.

Conclusion: VW-MRI is a reproducible and accurate imaging modality for detecting GCA, even among less-experienced readers. This study advocates for the use of VW-MRI when diagnosing GCA even in less-experienced centers.

Clinical relevance statement: VW-MRI is a reproducible and accurate imaging modality for detecting GCA, even among less-experienced readers, and it could be used as a first-line diagnostic tool for GCA in centers with limited expertise in GCA diagnosis.

Key points: • Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) is a reproducible and accurate imaging modality for detecting giant cell arteritis (GCA) in both extracranial and intracranial arteries. • The reproducibility of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for giant cell arteritis diagnosis was high among expert readers and moderate among less-experienced readers. • The use of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for giant cell arteritis diagnosis can be recommended even in centers with less-experienced readers.

Keywords: Giant cell arteritis; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Boiardi L, Hunder GG (2002) Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med 347:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra011913 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younger DS (2019) Giant cell arteritis. Neurol Clin 37:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2019.01.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C et al (2018) EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 77:636–643. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A et al (2021) American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 73(2021):1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41774 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ponte C, Grayson PC, Robson JC et al (2022) American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 74(2022):1881–1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42325 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources