Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 May 3;29(5):e643-e654.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad325.

Combined Lanreotide Autogel and Temozolomide Treatment of Progressive Pancreatic and Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Phase II SONNET Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Combined Lanreotide Autogel and Temozolomide Treatment of Progressive Pancreatic and Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Phase II SONNET Study

Marianne Pavel et al. Oncologist. .

Abstract

Background: In advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET), antiproliferative treatment options beyond somatostatin analogs remain limited. Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in NET alone or combined with other drugs.

Materials and methods: SONNET (NCT02231762) was an open, multicenter, prospective, phase II study to evaluate lanreotide autogel 120 mg (LAN) plus TMZ in patients with progressive advanced/metastatic grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET or of unknown primary. Patients could be enrolled at first-line or higher therapy line. The primary endpoint was disease control rate ([DCR], rate of stable disease [SD], partial [PR], and complete response [CR]) at 6 months of LAN and TMZ. Patients with nonfunctioning (NF) NET without progression at 6 months were randomized to 6-month LAN maintenance or watch and wait, patients with functioning (F)-NET with clinical benefit (PR, SD) continued on LAN.

Results: Fifty-seven patients were recruited. The majority of patients received the study drug at second or higher treatment line and had an NET G2. DCR at 6 months LAN and TMZ was 73.5%. After 6 months of further LAN maintenance, 54.5% of patients with F-NET and 71.4% with NF-NET had SD or PR vs 41.7% with NF-NET on observation only. LAN and TMZ were effective in all subgroups analyzed. At 12 months of follow-up, median progression-free survival was 11.1 months. Median serum chromogranin A decreased except in NF-NET on observation. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation appeared to better reflect TMZ response than loss of gene expression. During combination therapy, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events grade 3/4 reported were nausea (14%), thrombocytopenia (12.3%), and neutropenia (8.8%). Four deaths were reported resulting from severe adverse events not considered related to study medication.

Conclusions: LAN plus TMZ is a treatment option for patients with progressive GEP-NET with more aggressive biological profile showing a manageable safety profile.

Keywords: O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; gastrointestinal neoplasms; lanreotide; neuroendocrine tumors; receptors; somatostatin; temozolomide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Marianne Pavel reported a consulting/advisory relationship with Hutchmed and research funding from Ipsen and Novartis as well as honoraria from Ipsen, Novartis, AAA, MSD, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and streamedup, and Scientific Advisory Board for Ipsen, Novartis, AAA, and Riemser. Harald Lahner reported a consulting/advisory relationship with Ipsen, AAA, and Novartis, and honoraria from Ipsen, AAA, and Novartis. Dieter Hörsch has a consulting/advisory relationship with Ipsen and research funding from Ipsen. . Anja Rinke reported honoraria from Advanz Pharma, Esteve, Ipsen Pharma, and Novartis Pharma (including AAA/ Radiopharmaceuticals) and Scientific Advisory Board for AAA, Advanz Pharma, Esteve, Ipsen, and Novartis. Timm Denecke reported consulting/advisory relationship or honoraria from Bayer, be imaging, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, Takeda, AAA, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, and Merck, and research funding from Bayer, Siemens, and Guerbet.Arend Koch indicated no financial relationships. Benjamin Regnault is an employee of Ipsen. Dorit Helbig reported employment with Ipsen. Philipp Hoffmanns is an employee of Ipsen. Markus Raderer reported honoraria from Ipsen, Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, and Beigene.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. *Temozolomide dose increased during the combination phase, defined as a complete or partial response or stable disease assessed centrally using RECIST v1.1. Abbreviations: NET, neuroendocrine tumor; R, randomization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
DCR at 6 months of combination phase treatment and at further 6 months of maintenance phase treatment of NET patients. The first 3 columns of the right figure panel show overall response to LAN during maintenance treatment in patients with F- and NF-NET combined as well as separately. *No CR was observed during the study. Abbreviations: F, functional; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate (=CR + PR + SD); LAN, lanreotide autogel; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NF, nonfunctioning; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TMZ, temozolomide; W&W, watch and wait.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Box-Whisker plot. (A) Median serum CgA levels and IQR (first and third quartile) of GEP-NET patients according to subgroups of the maintenance phase; CgA normal range: <100 µg/L. (B) Median 5-HIAA levels and IQR (first and third quartile) of the group of LAN-treated patients with carcinoid syndrome; 5-HIAA normal range: 31.4-52.3 µmol/24 h. Changes from baseline to month 6 reflect combination phase and from months 6 to 12 maintenance phase. Abbreviations: CgA, chromogranin A; F, functioning; HIAA, hydroxyindoleacetic acid; IQR, interquartile range; LAN, lanreotide autogel; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NF, nonfunctioning; W&W, watch and wait.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Symptomatic response in categories in terms of daily diarrhea and flushing episodes in patients with carcinoid syndrome due to serotonin-producing NET (A) at 6 months (end of combination phase) and (B) at 12 months (end of maintenance phase). Abbreviation: NET, neuroendocrine tumors.

References

    1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al.. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):1335-1342. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, et al.. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(1):61-72. 10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70410-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oberg KE. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii72-vii80. 10.1093/annonc/mdq290 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pavel M, O’Toole D, Costa F, et al.. ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of distant metastatic disease of intestinal, pancreatic, bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of unknown primary site. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):172-185. 10.1159/000443167 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rinke A, Muller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al.. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4656-4663. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8510 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding