Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):580-588.
doi: 10.2337/dc23-1070.

Longitudinal Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on β-Cell Responses and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Longitudinal Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on β-Cell Responses and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial

Neda Rasouli et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term effects of glucose-lowering medications (insulin glargine U-100, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin) when added to metformin on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function.

Research design and methods: In the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) cohort with type 2 diabetes (n = 4,801), HOMA2 was used to estimate insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-%S) and fasting β-cell function (HOMA2-%B) at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 years on treatment. Oral glucose tolerance test β-cell responses (C-peptide index [CPI] and total C-peptide response [incremental C-peptide/incremental glucose over 120 min]) were evaluated at the same time points. These responses adjusted for HOMA2-%S in regression analysis provided estimates of β-cell function.

Results: HOMA2-%S increased from baseline to year 1 with glargine and remained stable thereafter, while it did not change from baseline in the other treatment groups. HOMA2-%B and C-peptide responses were increased to variable degrees at year 1 in all groups but then declined progressively over time. At year 5, CPI was similar between liraglutide and sitagliptin, and higher for both than for glargine and glimepiride [0.80, 0.87, 0.74, and 0.64 (nmol/L)/(mg/dL) * 100, respectively; P < 0.001], while the total C-peptide response was greatest with liraglutide, followed in descending order by sitagliptin, glargine, and glimepiride [1.54, 1.25, 1.02, and 0.87 (nmol/L)/(mg/dL) * 100, respectively, P < 0.001]. After adjustment for HOMA2-%S to obtain an estimate of β-cell function, the nature of the change in β-cell responses reflected those in β-cell function.

Conclusions: The differential long-term effects on insulin sensitivity and β-cell function of four different glucose-lowering medications when added to metformin highlight the importance of the loss of β-cell function in the progression of type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Duality of Interest. N.R. reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Novo Nordisk; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Eli Lilly; grants and personal fees from Sanofi; grants from Allergan; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. R.A.D. reports other support from AstraZeneca (advisory board, research support, speakers bureau), Novo Nordisk (advisory board), Boehringer Ingelheim (advisory board, research support), Intarcia (advisory board), and Merck (research support) outside the submitted work. J.B.M. reports grants from Medtronic, grants from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from MannKind, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, grants from NIH, and grants from JDRF outside the submitted work, personal fees from Salix Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Provention Bio, and personal fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific outside the submitted work. R.M.C. reports stock ownership from Bristol-Myers Squibb and stock ownership from Pfizer outside the submitted work. S.E.K. reports grants from Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research, during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Casma Therapeutics, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Intarcia, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Pfizer, and personal fees from Third Rock Ventures outside the submitted work. W.I.S. reports grant support from Iowa Fraternal Order of the Eagles and grant support from NIH outside the submitted work. K.M.U. reports research support from Avid, personal fees from Nevro, and research support from Lilly outside the submitted work. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of four different glucose-lowering medications on levels of HbA1c (A), fasting glucose (B), and fasting C-peptide (C). The square diagrams in the lower part of the panels denote the range of the P values for the six pairwise group comparisons of treatment groups. Bold line represents P < 0.05. G and Glim, glimepiride; I and Ins, insulin glargine; L and Lira, liraglutide; and S and Sita, sitagliptin. Rand. represents randomization, or baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of four different glucose-lowering medications on glucose (left) and C-peptide (right) profiles during the OGTT at baseline (A and B), at year 1 (C and D), at year 3 (E and F), and at year 5 (G and H).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of four different glucose-lowering medications on insulin sensitivity, β-cell responses, and β-cell function at baseline and years 1, 3, and 5 on treatment. HOMA2-%S based on C-peptide (A), HOMA2-%B based on C-peptide (B), CPI (C), total C-peptide response [calculated as 100 × (C-peptide incAUC0–120/(glucose incAUC0–120)] (D), CPI adjusted for HOMA2-%S (E), and total C-peptide response adjusted for HOMA2-%S (F). The square diagrams in the lower parts of the panels denote the range of the P values for the six pairwise group comparisons of treatment groups. Bold line represents P < 0.05. G and Glim, glimepiride; I and Ins, insulin glargine; L and Lira, liraglutide; S and Sita, sitagliptin. Rand. represents randomization, or baseline.

References

    1. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM.. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 2006;444:840–846 - PubMed
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group . U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes 1995;44:1249–1258 - PubMed
    1. Wajchenberg BL.. β-Cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment. Endocr Rev 2007;28:187–218 - PubMed
    1. Suleiman M, Marselli L, Cnop M, et al. . The role of beta cell recovery in type 2 diabetes remission. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:7435 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, et al. ; ADOPT Study Group . Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2427–2443 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms