Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 38212510
- DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01162-4
Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 May;25(5):617-618. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01208-1. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38642282 No abstract available.
Abstract
Localized high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogenous disease state with a wide range of presentations and outcomes. Historically, non-surgical management with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy was the treatment option of choice. However, surgical resection with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is increasingly utilized as a primary treatment modality for patients with HRPCa. Recent studies have demonstrated that surgery is an equivalent treatment option in select patients with the potential to avoid the side effects from androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy combined. Advances in imaging techniques and biomarkers have also improved staging and patient selection for surgical resection. Advances in robotic surgical technology grant surgeons various techniques to perform RP, even in patients with HR disease, which can reduce the morbidity of the procedure without sacrificing oncologic outcomes. Clinical trials are not only being performed to assess the safety and oncologic outcomes of these surgical techniques, but to also evaluate the role of surgical resection as a part of a multimodal treatment plan. Further research is needed to determine the ideal role of surgery to potentially provide a more personalized and tailored treatment plan for patients with localized HR PCa.
Keywords: High-risk; Local therapy; Prostatectomy; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Robotic; Surgery.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Dec;17(12):679-690. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00384-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Nat Rev Urol. 2020. PMID: 33173205 Review.
-
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Plus Extended Lymph Node Dissection in Combination With Immediate Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Cases of pT3-4N0-1M0 Prostate Cancer: A Multimodal Study of 8 Years' Follow-up.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):e321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26691668
-
Tailored treatment including radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy + androgen deprivation therapy versus exclusive radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients: results from a prospective study.Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):322-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.05. Int Braz J Urol. 2014. PMID: 25010298
-
Definition and Impact on Oncologic Outcomes of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-only Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Multimodal Therapy.Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Jun;5(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34176768
-
Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.Urol Int. 2019;103(2):125-136. doi: 10.1159/000497280. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Urol Int. 2019. PMID: 31039571 Review.
Cited by
-
CXCL14 in prostate cancer: complex interactions in the tumor microenvironment and future prospects.J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 4;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-06022-9. J Transl Med. 2025. PMID: 39755616 Free PMC article. Review.
References
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
-
- Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Macura KJ, Simopoulos DN, et al. Active surveillance of grade group 1 prostate cancer: long-term outcomes from a large prospective cohort. Eur Urol. 2020;77(6):675–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.017 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Davis M, Turner EL, et al. Fifteen-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(17):1547–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214122 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Davis M, Young GJ, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the protect randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020;77(3):320–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wilt TJ, Vo TN, Langsetmo L, Dahm P, Wheeler T, Aronson WJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy or observation for clinically localized prostate cancer: extended follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). Eur Urol. 2020;77(6):713–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.009 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ham WS, Chalfin HJ, Feng Z, Trock BJ, Epstein JI, Cheung C, et al. New prostate cancer grading system predicts long-term survival following surgery for Gleason Score 8–10 prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(6):907–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.006 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical