Efficacy and safety between radiofrequency ablation and types of cryoablation catheters for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
- PMID: 38212906
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.14915
Efficacy and safety between radiofrequency ablation and types of cryoablation catheters for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia referred for ablation. Periprocedural conduction system damage was a primary concern during AVNRT ablation. This study aimed to assess the incidence of permanent atrioventricular (AV) block and the success rate associated with different types of catheters in slow pathway ablation.
Method: A literature search was performed to identify studies that compared various techniques, including types of radiofrequency ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated) and different sizes of catheter tip cryoablation (4, 6, and 8-mm), in terms of their outcomes related to permanent atrioventricular block and success rate. To assess and rank the treatments for the different outcomes, a random-effects model of network meta-analysis, along with p-scores, was employed.
Results: A total of 27 studies with 5110 patients were included in the analysis. Overall success rates ranged from 89.78% to 100%. Point estimation showed 4-mm cryoablation exhibited an odds ratio of 0.649 (95%CI: 0.202-2.087) when compared to nonirrigated RFA. Similarly, 6-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.944 (95%CI: 0.307-2.905), 8-mm cryoablation had an odds ratio of 0.848 (95%CI: 0.089-8.107), and irrigated RFA had an odds ratio of 0.424 (95%CI: 0.058-3.121) compared to nonirrigated RFA.
Conclusion: Our study found no significant difference in the incidence of permanent AV block between the types of catheters. The success rates were consistently high across all groups. These findings emphasize the potential of both RF ablation (irrigated and nonirrigated catheter) and cryoablation as viable options for the treatment of AVNRT, with similar safety and efficacy profile.
Keywords: atrioventricular block; atrioventricular nodal reentrant (AVNRT) tachycardia; cryoablation; irrigated catheter; non-irrigated catheter; radiofrequency ablation.
© 2024 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9842-2. Epub 2013 Nov 29. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24293174
-
Cryoablation versus RF ablation for AVNRT: A meta-analysis and systematic review.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;24(12):1354-60. doi: 10.1111/jce.12247. Epub 2013 Sep 9. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013. PMID: 24016223
-
Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Jul;11(7):829-36. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.811968. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013. PMID: 23895026
-
Comparing Low-to-Zero Fluoroscopic Navigation Systems for AVNRT Catheter Ablation: A Network Meta-Analysis.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):1574-1585. doi: 10.1111/pace.15096. Epub 2024 Oct 22. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 39437197
-
Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Pediatric Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia.Cardiology. 2025;150(3):320-338. doi: 10.1159/000541178. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Cardiology. 2025. PMID: 39236694
References
REFERENCES
-
- Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias-executive summary. A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1493-1531.
-
- Hindricks G. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) investigators of the working group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1644-1653.
-
- Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, et al. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation. 1995;91:2264-2273.
-
- Bertini M, Brieda A, Balla C, et al. Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by means of flexible-tip irrigated catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;58:61-67.
-
- Taneja T, Stephen Huang SK. 3 - Irrigated and cooled-tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. In: Huang SKS, Miller JM, eds. Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2019:27-38.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources