Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 11;3(1):pgad414.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad414. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Hot carbonates deep within the Chicxulub impact structure

Affiliations

Hot carbonates deep within the Chicxulub impact structure

Pim Kaskes et al. PNAS Nexus. .

Abstract

Constraining the thermodynamic conditions within an impact structure during and after hypervelocity impacts is extremely challenging due to the transient thermal regimes. This work uses carbonate clumped-isotope thermometry to reconstruct absolute temperatures of impact lithologies within and close to the ∼66 Myr old Chicxulub crater (Yucatán, México). We present stable oxygen (δ18O), carbon (δ13C), and clumped-isotope (Δ47) data for carbonate-bearing impact breccias, impact melt rock, and target lithologies from four drill cores on a transect through the Chicxulub structure from the northern peak ring to the southern proximal ejecta blanket. Clumped isotope-derived temperatures (T47)) are consistently higher than maximum Late Cretaceous sea surface temperatures (35.5°C), except in the case of Paleogene limestones and melt-poor impact breccias outside of the crater, confirming the influence of burial diagenesis and a widespread and long-lived hydrothermal system. The melt-poor breccia unit outside the crater is overlain by melt-rich impact breccia yielding a much higher T47) of 111 ± 10°C (1 standard error [SE]), which likely traces the thermal processing of carbonate material during ejection. Finally, T47) up to 327 ± 33°C (1 SE) is determined for the lower suevite and impact melt rock intervals within the crater. The highest temperatures are related to distinct petrological features associated with decarbonation and rapid back-reaction, in which highly reactive CaO recombines with impact-released CO2 to form secondary CaCO3 phases. These observations have important climatic implications for the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event, as current numerical models likely overestimate the release of CO2 from the Chicxulub impact event.

Keywords: Chicxulub; back-reaction; clumped isotopes; decarbonation; impactites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Chicxulub impact structure and sample locations. A) Simplified surface geological map of the northern part of the Yucatán Peninsula in México showing the location of the buried Chicxulub peak ring crater and the boreholes selected in this study (modified from Refs. [3, 4, 18–20]). The blue arrow indicates a gap in the inner ring of the Chicxulub structure and shows a potential pathway of water re-entering the crater after formation (4). B) Schematic geological cross-section through the Chicxulub impact structure displaying the boreholes and the interpreted sequence of crustal rock, Cretaceous carbonate basement (in gray), impact melt rock (in black), suevite (in green), breccia (Bunte breccia type in brown), polymict lithic impact breccia (in blue), and postimpact sediments (in orange, modified from Refs. [17, 20, 21]). C) Model of the Chicxulub postimpact hydrothermal system in cross-section, with isotherms representing the initial temperature distribution immediately after impact (modified from Ref. [22]).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Stratigraphic overview showing T47) data vs. depth, lithology, and sample type of the four Chicxulub drill cores. A) IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 drill core from Site M0077, with in the inset between 616.2 and 617.8 mbsf also compiled T47) data from Bralower et al. (30); B) PEMEX Yucatán-6 (Y6); C) ICDP Yaxcopoil-1 (Yax-1); D) UNAM-7. The red dashed line represents the maximum Late Cretaceous SSTs, as compiled by Upchurch et al. (40). Error bars correspond to 2 SE.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Isotopic cross-relationships of the Chicxulub impactites. A) Relationship between δ18O data and average T47) data with the symbols referring to the lithological units from the four different drill cores. Dashed lines are constant δ18Owater (VSMOW) values of possible diagenetic fluids based on the carbonate–water equilibrium relationships of O’Neil et al. (41). Data plotting along these curves would indicate alteration via secondary processes, which can explain a large part of the dataset but not all data points (see explanation in the main text). B) Isotopic cross plot showing δ13C vs. δ18O data, with colors indicative of the corresponding average T47) values. Dashed lines from right to left correspond to O-C isotope depletion patterns observed in contact metamorphic case studies 1 (Mount Royal pluton, Quebec), 2 (Alta Stock, Utah), and 3 (Pine Creek, California) as summarized in Baumgartner and Valley (42), reflecting a trend from unaltered carbonates in the upper right toward marbles and eventually igneous compositions in the lower left. Most of the isotopic signatures of the Chicxulub impactites from this study can be explained by hydrothermal processes similar to contact metamorphism. As a comparison, literature δ13C and δ18O values of Y6 (cores N15–N19) (43) and Yax-1 (between depths 800 and 883 mbs) (19) are shown (lacking clumped-isotope data) that largely follow the same trend. However, an IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 impact melt rock sample (721.45 mbsf) and suevites from UNAM-7, Y6, and IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 yield different isotopic compositions and higher T47), which likely reflects mixing with (molten) silicates, and the preservation of a signal primarily linked to thermal impact processes superimposed by the hydrothermal overprint. C) Relationship between δ18O and CaCO3 content (in wt%, based on µXRF analysis) of the different Chicxulub crater lithologies, with colors indicating the T47) data. The dashed lines represent the evolution of the δ18O composition of a marine carbonate (with typical unaltered calcite values around 25‰ VSMOW [44]) or an anhydrite-dominated lithology (exemplified by the UNAM-7 lithic breccia with ∼50 wt% CaCO3 and an δ18O value of ∼28‰ VSMOW) toward a quartz composition (with 0 wt% CaCO3 and an δ18O value of ∼10‰ VSMOW [44]). Large parts of the impactite dataset follow one of these lines, which illustrates the importance of mixing with silicate components. Exp. 364 Pg lst—Paleogene limestone of the IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 core (616.24–616.56 mbsf). TU—Transitional unit of the IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 core (616.56–617.34 mbsf).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Petrographic similarities between Chicxulub samples and experimental analogs. The IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 impact melt rock interval, yielding high T47) (327 ± 33°C [1 SE]), shows similar macro- and micro-textures compared to results from laser-irradiation experiments on a limestone target (8). A) Halfcore photograph of IODP–ICDP Exp. 364 core section 87_2 (69–81 cm; 721.35–721.47 mbsf) displaying smooth green textures, which were analyzed in this isotopic study (see yellow area and Fig. S1B sample #6). B) Reflected-light photomicrograph and C) zoomed-in scanning electron microscopy-backscatter electron (SEM-BSE) image of an ooid-limestone plate after laser irradiation, showing successive thermal decomposition of CaCO3 resulting in white decomposition products and eventually in lustrous green CaO slag (modified from Hamann et al. [8]). D) Equigranular-like calcite matrix of the smooth textures in sample 721.45 mbsf, displaying subhedral calcite (Cal) grains of ∼5–15 μm in size, interspersed with minor smectite (Smc). E) Equigranular matrix of the zone with the decomposition products from the laser experiment showing euhedral calcite crystallites of ∼1–2 μm in size (modified from Hamann et al. [8]).

References

    1. Hildebrand AR, et al. 1991. Chicxulub Crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Geology. 19:867–871.
    1. Swisher CC, et al. 1992. Coeval 40Ar/39Ar ages of 65.0 million years ago from Chicxulub crater melt rock and Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary tektites. Science. 257:954–958. - PubMed
    1. Morgan J, et al. 1997. Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater. Nature. 390:472–476.
    1. Gulick SPS, et al. 2008. Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater. Nat Geosci. 1:131–135.
    1. Rae ASP, et al. 2019. Stress-strain evolution during peak-ring formation: a case study of the Chicxulub impact structure. J Geophys Res Planets. 124:396–417.