Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):416.
doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1384. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review

Dean H Meshkin et al. Ann Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Complications associated with implant-based reconstruction have a spectrum of severity with sequelae ranging from mild aesthetic deformities to additional surgery, reconstructive failure and systemic illness. The purpose of this narrative review of the literature is to provide updated evidence-based information on the management of complications in implant-based reconstruction.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, OVID MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify common complications associated with implant-based breast reconstruction, incidences of occurrence as well as preventative and management strategies.

Key content and findings: Pertinent short and long-term complications of implant-based breast reconstruction include hematoma, implant infection, seroma, skin envelope necrosis, capsular contracture, rupture, malposition, animation and contour deformities, implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and breast implant illness. Important preventative measures for short term complications include meticulous sterile technique and antibiotic irrigation, adequate drainage and critical evaluation of mastectomy flaps. Management of short-term complications requires early recognition and aggressive treatment to prevent reconstructive failure as well as long-term complications such as capsular contracture. Important technological advances include dual-port expanders for seroma drainage, indocyanine green angiography for mastectomy flap perfusion evaluation, cohesive form-stable implants for treatment of rippling, and various biologic and synthetic mesh products for pocket control and correction.

Conclusions: Important principles in management of short-term complications in implant-based reconstruction include aggressive and early intervention to maximize the chance of reconstructive salvage. Contemporary technological advances have played an important role in both prevention and treatment of complications. Over-arching principles in management of implant-based reconstruction complications focus on preventative techniques and preoperative patient counseling on potential risks, their likelihood, and necessary treatments to allow for informed and shared decision-making.

Keywords: Breast reconstruction; breast implants; complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-1384/coif). The series “Breast Reconstruction” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dual-port tissue expanders allow for aspiration of seroma fluid in the implant pocket through a second aspiration port. (A) Placement of a dual-port tissue expander in the prepectoral plane without ADM. (B) In-office aspiration of seroma after drain removal. ADM, acellular dermal matrix.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate prepectoral reconstruction without ADM demonstrating preservation of the subcutaneous tissue superficial to the breast pseudocapsule. ADM, acellular dermal matrix.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total submuscular reconstruction using pectoralis major and serratus fascia due to concern for compromised mastectomy flaps intraoperatively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Well-vascularized tissue between the prosthesis and the skin can help prevent significant complications after mastectomy flap ischemia. (A) Evidence of marginal mastectomy flap incisional ischemia in an immediate total submuscular two-stage reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. (B) Resultant small full-thickness dehiscence of incision to underlying muscle amenable to in-office debridement and closure (C) with subsequent healing (D).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Implant exposure after nipple-sparing mastectomy and prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction at an outside hospital requiring explantation and planned future autologous reconstruction.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Autologous fat grafting is a useful adjunctive tool to address contour deformities. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in a low body mass index patient (A) before and (B) after autologous fat grafting to improve upper pole fullness.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report: ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. 2020. Available online: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-su...
    1. DeLong MR, Tandon VJ, Farajzadeh M, et al. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144:967e-74e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006212 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:818-29. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ccdaa4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frey JD, Choi M, Salibian AA, et al. Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1300-10. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003340 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haddock NT, Kadakia Y, Liu Y, et al. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:1-9. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008013 - DOI - PubMed