Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Dec;43(2):133-145.

Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Hip Preservation Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Hip Preservation Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Emily A Parker et al. Iowa Orthop J. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Female patients undergoing hip preservation surgery often have inferior patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), raising concerns about the clinical benefit of hip preservation surgery in women. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative PROs, and change in PROs, for female versus (vs.) male hip preservation patients was completed via systematic review.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Em-base databases were searched. Level I-IV studies of patients undergoing surgical intervention for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and/or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with at least two years of postoperative follow-up were included. Sex-stratified PRO scores or outcome information had to be included.

Results: We identified 32 hip preservation studies evaluating sex-related PRO differences, and/or providing sex-specific PRO data. The quantitative analysis of 24 studies (1843 patients) was stratified by DDH status. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific subscale (HOS-SSS) were assessed. Patients undergoing surgery for FAI only were 52.1% female (n= 806/1546). As predicted, women had lower preoperative PRO scores, however, they had significantly greater improvements in HOS-ADL (20.14±4.41 vs. 26.00±0.35, p<0.05) and HOS-SSS (33.21± 0.71 vs. 38.33± 0.46, p<0.05) compared to males. Similar results were found in the DDH cohort of 330 patients (72.1% female): females had lower preoperative PRO scores, but significantly greater improvement of mHHS (22.68±0.45 vs. 10.60±1.46, p<0.01).

Conclusion: The present review suggests that men undergoing surgery for FAI and/or DDH tend to have higher preoperative and postoperative PRO scores. However, it appears that women often have greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in PRO scores. This finding is strongest in surgical treatment of DDH. Level of Evidence: III.

Keywords: clinical assessment/grading scales; femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; hip arthroscopy; hip labral tears; medical aspects of sports; patient-reported outcome scores; patient-reported outcomes; sex-based physiologic differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: EAP and RP declare no competing interests. MCW reports personal fees from Dupuy Synthes Sales Inc, other from Smith and Nephew, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet Inc, personal fees from Stryker Corp, outside the submitted work. RWW reports personal fees, non-financial support, and other from Smith & Nephew, other from Arthrex, other from Wardlow Enterprises, personal fees from Medical Device Business Systems, personal fees from Linvatec Corp, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1A to 1B.
Figure 1A to 1B.
FAI Male vs. Female Pre- and Postoperative PROs; Male vs. Female ΔPRO. HOS: Hip Outcome Score, ADL: Activities of Daily Living, SSS: Sports-Specific Subscale, mHHS: modified Harris Hip Score, Pre-Op: preoperative, Post-Op: postoperative, Δ PRO: absolute change from preoperative to postoperative PRO.
Figure 2A to 2B.
Figure 2A to 2B.
DDH Male vs. Female Pre- and Postoperative, ΔmHHS. HOS: Hip Outcome Score, ADL: Activities of Daily Living, SSS: Sports-Specific Subscale, mHHS: modified Harris Hip Score, Pre-Op: preoperative, Post-Op: postoperative, ΔPRO: absolute change from preoperative to postoperative PRO.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clohisy JC, Ackerman J, Baca G, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy from the prospective ANCHOR cohort study. Review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2017;99(1):33–41. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.15.00798. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amenabar T, O'Donnell J. Return to sport in Australian football league footballers after hip ar-throscopy and midterm outcome. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1188–94. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben Tov T, Amar E, Shapira A, Steinberg E, Atoun E, Rath E. Clinical and functional outcome after acetabular labral repair in patients aged older than 50 years. Arthroscopy. 2014 Mar;30(3):305–10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.12.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cvetanovich GL, Levy DM, Kuhns BD, et al. Do Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Have Inferior Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Compared With Patients With Normal Acetabular Coverage? American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;45(9):2116–2124. doi: 10.1177/0363546517702855. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dierckman BD, Ni J, Hohn EA, Domb BG. Does duration of symptoms affect clinical outcome after hip arthroscopy for labral tears? Analysis of prospectively collected outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Dec;4(4):308–317. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnx023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources