Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 genetic variability: A post-market surveillance workflow for combined bioinformatic and laboratory evaluation of commercial RT-PCR assay performance
- PMID: 38215170
- PMCID: PMC10786374
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294271
Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 genetic variability: A post-market surveillance workflow for combined bioinformatic and laboratory evaluation of commercial RT-PCR assay performance
Abstract
Objective: The speed at which Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is mutating has made it necessary to frequently assess how these genomic changes impact the performance of diagnostic real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Herein, we describe a generic three-step workflow to assess the effect of genomic mutations on inclusivity and sensitivity of RT-PCR assays.
Methods: Sequences collected from the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) were mapped to a SARS-CoV-2 reference genome to evaluate the position and prevalence of mismatches in the oligonucleotide-binding sites of the QIAstat-Dx, an RT-PCR panel designed to detect SARS-CoV-2. The frequency of mutations and their impact on melting temperature were assessed, and sequences flagged by risk-based criteria were examined in vitro.
Results: Out of 8,900,393 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences analyzed, only 173 (0.0019%) genomes contained potentially critical mutations for the QIAstat-Dx; follow-up in-vitro testing confirmed no impact on the assays' performance.
Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants do not affect the performance of the QIAstat-Dx device. It is recommended that manufacturers incorporate this workflow into obligatory post-marketing surveillance activities, as this approach could potentially enhance genetic monitoring of their product.
Copyright: © 2024 Kosińska-Selbi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: All authors were QIAGEN employees at the time of writing this manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):e00630-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00630-20. Print 2020 Jul 23. J Clin Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32341142 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel, a rapid multiplex PCR method for the diagnosis of COVID-19.J Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;28(6):729-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 9. J Infect Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35184977 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple assays in a real-time RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 panel can mitigate the risk of loss of sensitivity by new genomic variants during the COVID-19 outbreak.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:225-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32535302 Free PMC article.
-
Deepening of In Silico Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection RT-qPCR Assays in the Context of New Variants.Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;12(4):565. doi: 10.3390/genes12040565. Genes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33924636 Free PMC article.
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benevides Lima L, Mesquita FP, Brasil de Oliveira LL, Andrea da Silva Oliveira F Elisabete Amaral de Moraes M, Souza PFN, et al.. True or false: what are the factors that influence COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-qPCR? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2022;22(2):157–67. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2022.2037425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous