Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 12;36(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00209-y.

Enhanced deep learning model enables accurate alignment measurement across diverse institutional imaging protocols

Affiliations

Enhanced deep learning model enables accurate alignment measurement across diverse institutional imaging protocols

Sung Eun Kim et al. Knee Surg Relat Res. .

Abstract

Background: Achieving consistent accuracy in radiographic measurements across different equipment and protocols is challenging. This study evaluates an advanced deep learning (DL) model, building upon a precursor, for its proficiency in generating uniform and precise alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs irrespective of institutional imaging differences.

Methods: The enhanced DL model was trained on over 10,000 radiographs. Utilizing a segmented approach, it separately identified and evaluated regions of interest (ROIs) for the hip, knee, and ankle, subsequently integrating these regions. For external validation, 300 datasets from three distinct institutes with varied imaging protocols and equipment were employed. The study measured seven radiologic parameters: hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, weight-bearing line ratio, joint line obliquity angle, and lateral distal tibial angle. Measurements by the model were compared with an orthopedic specialist's evaluations using inter-observer and intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Additionally, the absolute error percentage in alignment measurements was assessed, and the processing duration for radiograph evaluation was recorded.

Results: The DL model exhibited excellent performance, achieving an inter-observer ICC between 0.936 and 0.997, on par with an orthopedic specialist, and an intra-observer ICC of 1.000. The model's consistency was robust across different institutional imaging protocols. Its accuracy was particularly notable in measuring the hip-knee-ankle angle, with no instances of absolute error exceeding 1.5 degrees. The enhanced model significantly improved processing speed, reducing the time by 30-fold from an initial 10-11 s to 300 ms.

Conclusions: The enhanced DL model demonstrated its ability for accurate, rapid alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs, regardless of protocol variations, signifying its potential for broad clinical and research applicability.

Keywords: Accuracy; Alignment measurement; Deep learning; Full-leg radiographs; Imaging protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.W.N is a paid employee of CONNECTEVE Co., LTD. D.H.R is CEO of CONNECTEVE Co., Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic process of training the DL model. CNN; convolutional neural network
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of full-leg radiographs from Institutes A, B, and C, with each letter representing the corresponding institute
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bland–Altman plots of the total validation set for each radiologic parameters. a hip-knee-ankle angle. b lateral distal femoral angle. c medial proximal tibial angle. d joint line convergence angle. e weight-bearing line ratio. f joint line obliquity angle. g lateral distal tibial angle

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Bingham RJ, Ek ET, Stoney JD, Choong PF. The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography. Knee. 2013;20(4):242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skyttä ET, Lohman M, Tallroth K, Remes V. Comparison of standard anteroposterior knee and hip-to-ankle radiographs in determining the lower limb and implant alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Surg. 2009;98(4):250–253. doi: 10.1177/145749690909800411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Federer SJ, Jones GG. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: a scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0260471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260471. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simon S, Schwarz GM, Aichmair A, Frank BJH, Hummer A, DiFranco MD, et al. Fully automated deep learning for knee alignment assessment in lower extremity radiographs: a cross-sectional diagnostic study. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51(6):1249–1259. doi: 10.1007/s00256-021-03948-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tack A, Preim B, Zachow S. Fully automated Assessment of Knee Alignment from Full-Leg X-Rays employing a "YOLOv4 And Resnet Landmark regression Algorithm" (YARLA): Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;205:106080. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106080. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources