Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Role of Ribosome Reduction in Impeding Oogenesis in Female Triploid Crassostrea Gigas
- PMID: 38217752
- DOI: 10.1007/s10126-024-10283-2
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Role of Ribosome Reduction in Impeding Oogenesis in Female Triploid Crassostrea Gigas
Abstract
The fecundity of triploid female Crassostrea gigas exhibited significant variation and was lower compared to diploid individuals. Previous studies categorized mature stage triploid female C. gigas into two groups: female α, characterized by a high number of oocytes, and female β, displaying few or no oocytes. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying irregular oogenesis and fecundity differences in triploid C. gigas, we performed a comparative analysis of gonad transcriptomes at different stages of gonadal development, including female α, female β, and diploids. During early oogenesis, functional enrichment analysis between female diploids and putative female β triploids revealed differently expressed genes (DEGs) in the ribosome and ribosome biogenesis pathways. Expression levels of DEGs in these pathways were significantly decreased in the putative female β triploid, suggesting a potential role of reduced ribosome levels in obstructing triploid oogenesis. Moreover, to identify regulatory pathways in gonad development, female oysters at the early and mature stages were compared. The DNA repair and recombination proteins pathways were enriched in female diploids and female α triploids but absent in female β triploids. Overall, we propose that decreased ribosome biogenesis in female triploids hinders the differentiation of germ stem cells, leading to the formation of a large number of abnormal germ cells and ultimately resulting in reduced fecundity. The variation in fertility among triploids appeared to be related to the degree of DNA damage repair during female gonad development. This study offers valuable insights into the oogenesis process in female triploid C. gigas.
Keywords: Crassostrea gigas; Oogenesis; Ribosome; Triploid.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Overexpression of CDC42 causes accumulation of DNA damage leading to failure of oogenesis in triploid Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas.Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Dec;282(Pt 2):136769. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136769. Epub 2024 Oct 26. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024. PMID: 39490852
-
Reduced Sox2 Gene Expression Leads to Impaired Gonadal Development in Female Triploid Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas.Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2025 Jul 18;27(4):114. doi: 10.1007/s10126-025-10496-z. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2025. PMID: 40679654
-
Integrated Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Gonads Reveal Disruption of Germ Cell Proliferation and Division, and Energy Storage in Glycogen in Sterile Triploid Pacific Oysters (Crassostrea gigas).Cells. 2021 Oct 5;10(10):2668. doi: 10.3390/cells10102668. Cells. 2021. PMID: 34685648 Free PMC article.
-
Variance in expression and localization of sex-related genes CgDsx, CgBHMG1 and CgFoxl2 during diploid and triploid Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas gonad differentiation.Gene. 2021 Jul 20;790:145692. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145692. Epub 2021 May 4. Gene. 2021. PMID: 33961972
-
Genetic improvement for disease resistance in oysters: A review.J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Oct;131:226-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 30. J Invertebr Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26037230 Review.
References
-
- Aitken RJ (2022) Role of sperm DNA damage in creating de-novo mutations in human offspring: the ‘post-meiotic oocyte collusion’ hypothesis. Reprod Biomed Online 45:109–124 - PubMed
-
- Allen SK, Downing SL (1990) Performance of triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas: gametogenesis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:1213–1222
-
- Armistead J, Triggs-Raine B (2014) Diverse diseases from a ubiquitous process: the ribosomopathy paradox. FEBS Lett 588:1491–1500 - PubMed
-
- Beaumont AR, Fairbrother JE (1991) Ploidy manipulation in molluscan shellfish: a review. J Shellfish Res 10:1–18