Assessing bone formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in a murine model treated with bisphosphonates
- PMID: 38217802
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05480-7
Assessing bone formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in a murine model treated with bisphosphonates
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the osseointegration of implants with hydrophobic (HFB) and hydrophilic (HFL) surfaces in a murine model of high-dose bisphosphonates (BPs).
Materials and methods: Sixty-four rats were randomly allocated into four groups: control group with HFB implants (CG-HFB), control group with HFL implants (CG-HFL), BP group with HFB implants (BP-HFB), and BP group with HFL implants (BP-HFL). Animals were euthanized after 15 and 45 days (n=8). The dependent variables assessed were the removal torque (biomechanical analysis), the bone volume around the implants (%BV/TV) (microtomographic analysis), the bone-implant contact (%BIC), the bone between the threads (%BBT) (histomorphometric analysis), and the expression of bone metabolism markers (immunohistochemistry analysis).
Results: The CG-HFL and BP-HFL groups presented higher removal torque than the CG-HFB and BP-HFB implants. The %BIC of the CG-HFL surfaces was slightly higher than that of the CG-HFB implants. The BP-HFB and BP-HFL groups presented a higher %BIC than that of the CG-HFB and CG-HFL groups (p<0.001). BP therapy also increased the %BBT at both implant surfaces. Higher levels of ALP were observed in the matrix region of bone tissue on the HFL surfaces than on the HFB surfaces.
Conclusion: Both surfaces enable osseointegration in rats under BP therapy.
Clinical relevance: The study demonstrates that hydrophobic (HFB) and hydrophilic (HFL) implant surfaces can promote osseointegration in rats undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. The HFL surfaces exhibited improved biomechanical performance, higher bone-implant contact, and increased bone volume, suggesting their potential clinical relevance for implant success in individuals on bisphosphonate treatment.
Keywords: Bisphosphonates; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Surface properties.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Histomorphometric analysis of implant osseointegration using hydrophilic implants in diabetic rats.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5867-5878. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03892-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33765194
-
Influence of obesity on osseointegration of implants with different surface treatments: A preclinical study.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Oct;25(5):919-928. doi: 10.1111/cid.13234. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 37309706
-
Osseointegration of implants with superhydrophilic surfaces in rats with high serum levels of nicotine.Braz Dent J. 2023 Mar-Apr;34(2):105-112. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305096. Braz Dent J. 2023. PMID: 37194848 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of systemic bisphosphonate delivery on osseointegration of implants under osteoporotic conditions: lessons from animal studies.Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Sep;59(9):912-20. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 May 16. Arch Oral Biol. 2014. PMID: 24908376 Review.
-
Effect of bisphosphonate treatment of titanium surfaces on alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01089-4. BMC Oral Health. 2020. PMID: 32334598 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Analysis of peri-implant bone tissue between hydrophilic and rough implant surfaces in spontaneously hypertensive rats treated with losartan.J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Jun 24;32:e20230374. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0374. eCollection 2024. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024. PMID: 38922240 Free PMC article.
-
Different Methods to Modify the Hydrophilicity of Titanium Implants with Biomimetic Surface Topography to Induce Variable Responses in Bone Marrow Stromal Cells.Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Apr 10;9(4):227. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9040227. Biomimetics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38667238 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D (2017) Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 73:22–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12179 - DOI
-
- Lane NE (2006) Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.047 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tolia M, Zygogianni A, Kouvaris JR, Meristoudis C, Margari N, Karakitsos P, Kokakis I, Kardamakis D, Papadimitriou C, Mystakidou K, Tsoukalas N, Kyrgias G, Armonis B, Filippiadis DK, Kelekis AD, Kelekis N, Kouloulias V (2014) The key role of bisphosphonates in the supportive care of cancer patients. Anticancer Res 34:23–37 - PubMed
-
- Conte Neto N, Spolidorio LC, Andrade CR, Bastos AS, Guimaraes M, Marcantonio E Jr (2013) Experimental development of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in rodents. Int J Exp Pathol 94:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.12007 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Tella SH, Gallagher JC (2014) Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 142:155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources