Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 13;14(1):1253.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51608-4.

New strategies for sterilization and preservation of fresh fish skin grafts

Affiliations

New strategies for sterilization and preservation of fresh fish skin grafts

Ahmed Ibrahim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The introduction of fish skin as a biological dressing for treating burns and wounds holds great promise, offering an alternative to existing management strategies. However, the risk of disease transmission is a significant concern. Therefore, this study aimed to examine how established sterilization and preservation procedures affected fish skin grafts' microbiological and histological properties for long-term usage. Lyophilization of the fish skin graft followed by rehydration in normal saline for 15 min did not change the collagen content. Furthermore, gamma irradiation of the lyophilized fish skin graft at different lengths 5, 10, and 25 KGy showed a significant reduction in microbial growth (aerobic bacteria, aerobic yeasts, and fungi) at 15- and 30 days after the irradiation. However, exposure to 10 KGy was found to be the most effective intensity among the different gamma irradiation lengths since it preserved the collagen fiber content and intensity in the lyophilized fish skin grafts at 15- and 30 days after the irradiation. These findings provide efficient preservation and sterilization methods for long-term usage of the fresh Tilapia skin grafts used for biological dressings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) and (B) Gross micrographs of the fish skin after the lyophilization, (C) vacuum- packaging.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total accounts (CFU/cm2 ± S.D) of aerobic bacteria (A), aerobic yeasts (B), and aerobic filamentous fungi (A) on lyophilized fish skin sterilized with gamma irradiation (0, 5, 10, 25).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) and (B) Histological and histochemical evaluations of the fresh Tilapia skin, (C) and (D) the lyophilized Tilapia skin. (A, C) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. (B, D) Gomori’s trichrome-stained sections for collagen. The scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histological and histochemical evaluations of the lyophilized Tilapia fish skin submitted to different irradiation dosages 15-days post-sterilization. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were irradiated at 5 (A), 10 (C), and 25 (E) kGy. (B), (D), and (F) Gomori’s trichrome stained sections for collagen. The scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histological and histochemical evaluations of the lyophilized Tilapia fish skin submitted to different irradiation dosages 30-days post-sterilization. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were irradiated at 5 (A), 10 (C), and 25 (E) kGy. (B), (D), and (F) Gomori’s trichrome stained sections for collagen. The scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Evaluation of the collagen integrity, organization, and intensity in the lyophilized Tilapia fish skin submitted to different irradiation dosages. Collagen integrity and organization were evaluated based on a 0–3 scale as described in the materials and methods. The collagen intensity was quantified using ImageJ. The results are expressed as a percentage of the total number of pixels and are normalized to the control-treated group. Differences were evaluated using one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Costa BA, Lima Júnior EM, de Moraes Filho MO, Fechine FV, de Moraes MEA, Silva Júnior FR, do Nascimento Soares MFA, Rocha MBS. Use of Tilapia skin as a Xenograft for pediatric burn treatment: A case report. J. Burn Care Res. Off. Publ. Am. Burn Assoc. 2019;40(5):714–717. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Júnior EML, de Moraes Filho MO, Costa BA, Alves APNN, de Moraes MEA, do Nascimento Uchôa AM, Martins CB, de Jesus Pinheiro Gomes Bandeira T, Rodrigues FAR, Paier CRK. Lyophilised tilapia skin as a xenograft for superficial partial thickness burns: A novel preparation and storage technique. J. Wound Care. 2020;29(10):598–602. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.10.598. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima Júnior EM, de Moraes Filho MO, Costa BA, Fechine FV, Rocha MBS, Vale ML, Diógenes AKL, Uchôa AMN, Silva Júnior FR, Martins CB. A randomized comparison study of lyophilized Nile tilapia skin and silver-impregnated sodium carboxymethylcellulose for the treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns. J. Burn Care Res. 2021;42(1):41–48. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa099. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima Junior EM, de Moraes Filho MO, Costa BA, Fechine FV, Vale ML, Diogenes AKL, Neves KRT, Uchoa AMN, Soares MFAN, de Moraes MEA. Nile tilapia fish skin-based wound dressing improves pain and treatment-related costs of superficial partial-thickness burns: A phase III randomized controlled trial. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021;147(5):1189–1198. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007895. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima Júnior EM, De Moraes Filho MO, Costa BA, Rohleder AVP, Sales Rocha MB, Fechine FV, Forte AJ, Alves APNN, Silva Júnior FR, Martins CB. Innovative burn treatment using tilapia skin as a xenograft: A phase II randomized controlled trial. J. Burn Care Res. 2020;41(3):585–592. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz205. - DOI - PubMed