Editorial Commentary: Two-Year Follow-Up Is Too Short to Determine the Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair
- PMID: 38219120
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.045
Editorial Commentary: Two-Year Follow-Up Is Too Short to Determine the Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair
Abstract
Although recent studies have shown good results of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair at 2-year follow-up, one must be careful in adopting this technique. Historically, the classic study from West Point showed repair fails at 5 years. Perhaps future results will be improved with scaffolds, augmentation, or biologics. Only time will tell. For now, what's the (West) Point?
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The author declares the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: consultant with Arthrex and publishing royalties from Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer.
Comment on
-
Suture-Augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair for Proximal Avulsion or High-Grade Partial Tears Shows Similar Side-to-Side Difference and No Clinical Differences at Two Years Versus Conventional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Mid-Substance Tears or Poor Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Quality.Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):857-867. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Arthroscopy. 2024. PMID: 37479153
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
