Editorial Commentary: Ceiling Effects Are a Limitation of Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Used to Assess Shoulder Function: Appropriate Selection of Shoulder Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Is Required-Especially in Athletes
- PMID: 38219133
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.001
Editorial Commentary: Ceiling Effects Are a Limitation of Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Used to Assess Shoulder Function: Appropriate Selection of Shoulder Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Is Required-Especially in Athletes
Abstract
Ceiling effects (CEs) are a major limitation of frequently used patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in the assessment of shoulder function. It is generally considered that a CE may be present when the best possible score for a given PROM is achieved by at least 15% of the study population. When a CE occurs, it typically indicates that the scoring criteria are relatively easy and therefore may not reliably capture greater levels of patient function. This is a particular problem with the use of activities of daily living-oriented PROMs in the evaluation of athletic patients because they can still score highly, despite limitations in athletic shoulder function. When a CE is present, it can result in failure to determine the true efficacy of a procedure, limited responsiveness to change, and furthermore if a subsequent comparison of 2 groups of patients is undertaken, it may produce similar results despite meaningful differences between them. It is important to recognize that CEs are common and have important consequences but that careful selection of PROMs adapted to the characteristics of the study population and the specific research question can help to mitigate these issues.
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: A.S. reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from MacMedical and Arthroscopy; consulting fees from Arthrex; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or, advocacy group, paid or unpaid: AANA (Associate Editor, Arthroscopy), American Journal of Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine editorial boards, and committees for International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; and AANA. M.C. reports Associate Editor, Arthroscopy. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Comment on
-
Subjective Shoulder Value for Sport Is a Simple, Reliable, and Valid Score to Assess Shoulder Function in Athletes.Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):702-710. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.056. Epub 2023 Aug 12. Arthroscopy. 2024. PMID: 37579953
-
Postoperative Shoulder Function Assessment: Proposing the Concept of "Forgotten Shoulder" Over "Normal Shoulder" as the New Standard in Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation.Arthroscopy. 2024 May;40(5):1392-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Arthroscopy. 2024. PMID: 38395268
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources