How do contraception preferences change over time? Eight years of experience in a tertiary hospital
- PMID: 38220240
- PMCID: PMC10807679
- DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230348
How do contraception preferences change over time? Eight years of experience in a tertiary hospital
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the contraceptive preferences of women based on their age and to track changes in these preferences over time.
Methods: This was an observational, retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from 2742 patients were evaluated for this study. The patient group of the first 4 years was classified as Group I (n=1371) and the last 4 years was classified as Group II (n=1371). The preferred contraception methods between the groups and their changes across the years were examined.
Results: Coitus interruptus was found to be the prevailing contraceptive method across all age groups, with 304 (70.9%) in 18-24 age group; 1314 (65.4%) in 25-40 age group; and 148 (48.8%) in 41-53 age group using this method. Breastfeeding rates were also analyzed across age groups, revealing that 11% of patients aged 18-24 years, 5% of patients aged 25-40 years, and 1.7% of patients aged 41-53 years were breastfeeding. Among these patients, 114 (74.5%) were not using any contraception method, while coitus interruptus remained the most popular choice.
Conclusion: It was determined that there are many couples who do not have sufficient knowledge regarding family planning and birth control in our country. At the same time, the use of birth control methods has increased due to the increase in the education level of women and easier access to sexual health services.
Keywords: contraception; contraceptive methods; family planning services.
Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.
Similar articles
-
History of unintended pregnancy and patterns of contraceptive use among racial and ethnic minority women veterans.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):564.e1-564.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32142832 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the frequency of coitus interruptus and the effect of contraception counselling on this frequency.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;41(3):453-458. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1754370. Epub 2020 Jun 16. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. PMID: 32543257
-
[USE OF CONTRACEPTION IN WOMEN FROM THE ZAPRESIĆ AREA AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE CHOICE OF METHOD: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY].Acta Med Croatica. 2014 Dec;68(4-5):337-43. Acta Med Croatica. 2014. PMID: 26285466 Croatian.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Adolescent contraception: nonhormonal methods.Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;36(3):717-30. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36693-7. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2660093 Review.
References
-
- Teal S, Edelman A.. Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: a review. JAMA 2021; 326: 2507-2518. - PubMed
-
- Batur P, Bowersox N, McNamara M.. Contraception: efficacy, risks, continuation rates, and use in high-risk women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2016; 25: 853-856. - PubMed
-
- Sezer A, Mutlu S, Yigit F. [Factors affecting married women’s family planning method preferences]. J Midwif & Health Sci 2021; 4: 128-138. [In Turkish]
-
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS.. Using multivariate statistics, 7th edition. [Updated 2019]. Available from: https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134790545.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical