Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 15;12(1):2.
doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00299-0.

MicroRNA-146a-loaded magnesium silicate nanospheres promote bone regeneration in an inflammatory microenvironment

Affiliations

MicroRNA-146a-loaded magnesium silicate nanospheres promote bone regeneration in an inflammatory microenvironment

Jiakang Yang et al. Bone Res. .

Abstract

Reconstruction of irregular oral-maxillofacial bone defects with an inflammatory microenvironment remains a challenge, as chronic local inflammation can largely impair bone healing. Here, we used magnesium silicate nanospheres (MSNs) to load microRNA-146a-5p (miR-146a) to fabricate a nanobiomaterial, MSN+miR-146a, which showed synergistic promoting effects on the osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). In addition, miR-146a exhibited an anti-inflammatory effect on mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway via targeting tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), and MSNs could simultaneously promote M2 polarization of BMMs. MiR-146a was also found to inhibit osteoclast formation. Finally, the dual osteogenic-promoting and immunoregulatory effects of MSN+miR-146a were further validated in a stimulated infected mouse mandibular bone defect model via delivery by a photocuring hydrogel. Collectively, the MSN+miR-146a complex revealed good potential in treating inflammatory irregular oral-maxillofacial bone defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the preparation and function of MSN+miR-146a for bone regeneration with an inflammatory microenvironment. a MSNs were synthesized from SiO2 nanoparticles and modified with PEI, and miR-146a was then loaded via physical absorption and electrostatic attraction. b The MSN+miR-146a complex significantly accelerated the osteogenesis of hDPSCs, reduced M1-type macrophages, increased M2-type macrophages, and promoted bone regeneration in infected mandibular bone defects in mice
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preparation and characterization of the MSN+miR-146a complex. ac ECM and TEM images and EDS of MSNs. d TEM images of MSN-PEI. e CCK-8 assay of hDPSCs after 8 and 24 h of coculture with PEI-modified MSNs at various concentrations. f, g Gel retardation and zeta potential tests of the MSN+miR-146a complex at different weight ratios. hj Cellular uptake assay of MSN+miR-146a-FAM in hDPSCs after 24 h of coculture. Cells were stained to label the cytoskeleton, cell membrane or lysosome. Yellow arrows indicate colocalization of lysosomes and MSN+miR-146a-FAM. ns no significance. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to the blank group was used
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MSNs+miR-146a improved the osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. a, b ALP staining and SR staining of hDPSCs after 7 days of osteogenic culture. c ARS staining of hDPSCs after 14 days of osteogenic culture. d Enzyme activity assay of intracellular ALP expression in hDPSCs after 7 days of osteogenic culture. e, f IF images and quantitative analysis (n = 4) of RUNX2 (green) in hDPSCs after 7 days of osteogenic culture. g, h qRT‒PCR (n = 3) and WB results of osteogenic biomarker expression in hDPSCs after 7 days of osteogenic culture. i, j WB and qRT‒PCR (n = 3) results of the expression of VEGF-A in hDPSCs after 24 h of coculture with LPS-stimulated BMM-derived conditioned medium. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test among all groups was used
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MSNs+miR-146a regulated BMM polarization and osteoclast formation. a Statistical results of flow cytometry of CD40-, Arg-1- or CD163-marked BMMs in the four groups after 24 h of LPS stimulation (n = 3). b The mRNA expression of IL-1β, IL-6, Arg-1 and IL-10 after 24 h of LPS stimulation (n = 3). ce IF images and quantitative analysis of CD86 (red)- and Arg-1 (green)-marked BMMs after 24 h of LPS stimulation (n = 4). f, g qRT-PCR (n = 3) and WB results of the expression of TRAF6 and phosphorylation level of p65 in BMMs after 24 h of LPS stimulation. h, i TRAP staining and quantitative analysis (n = 11) of osteoclasts in the four groups after 6 days of RANKL induction. j The mRNA expression of CTSK and DC-stamp in osteoclasts after 6 days of RANKL induction (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test among all groups was used
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
MSNs+miR-146a accelerated bone regeneration in a stimulated infected mouse mandibular defect model. a, b Micro-CT examinations of mouse mandible samples after 2 weeks (a) and 4 weeks (b) of healing following surgery with representative reconstructed volume and slice images and the mean BV/TV, BMD and Tb.Sp (n = 7–10). c Maximal force detected in the three-point bending test of trimmed mouse mandible samples (n = 8). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to the blank group was used
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
MSNs+miR-146a promoted bone regeneration but inhibited osteoclast formation. a HE staining of the mouse mandible samples after 2 and 4 weeks of healing. NB new bone, OB original bone. b Masson staining of the samples after 2 and 4 weeks of healing. Yellow arrows indicate blue-stained type I collagen of new bone. c Statistical analysis of the area proportion of bone tissues in Masson-stained slices of the samples after 2 and 4 weeks of healing (n = 9–10). d TRAP staining and quantitative analysis (n = 10) of the samples after 2 weeks of healing. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to the blank group was used
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
MSNs+miR-146a regulated the in vivo polarization of macrophages and promoted osteogenic marker expression. a IF images and quantitative analysis (n = 5) of the expression of Arg-1 (green) and Runx2 (red) in the defect area of mouse mandible samples after 2 weeks of healing. b IF images and quantitative analysis (n = 8) of the expression of CD86 (red) and Arg-1 (green) in the defect area of the samples after 2 weeks of healing. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons to the blank group was used

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marsell R, Einhorn TA. The biology of fracture healing. Injury. 2011;42:551–555. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahney CS, et al. Cellular biology of fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 2019;37:35–50. doi: 10.1002/jor.24170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zura R, et al. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:e162775. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arweiler NB, Netuschil L. The oral microbiota. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016;902:45–60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Candotto V, et al. Complication in third molar extractions. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2019;33:169–172. - PubMed

Publication types