Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;19(1):13-21.
doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i1.43894.

Comparative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Non-Randomized Trial Evaluating Calcified and Non-Calcified Pulp Chambers

Affiliations

Comparative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Non-Randomized Trial Evaluating Calcified and Non-Calcified Pulp Chambers

Aida Farhadi et al. Iran Endod J. 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: This non-randomized clinical trial investigated the outcomes of full pulpotomy in adult molars with irreversible pulpitis, comparing those with calcified and non-calcified pulp chambers over 6 and 12 months.

Materials and methods: A total of 101 adult permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis, in individuals over 12 years old, were categorized based on pulp chamber calcification observed in radiographic images by two endodontists. Subsequently, full pulpotomy procedures were performed, achieving hemostasis, and applying a 2 mm layer of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as a pulp covering agent. After 48 hours, the setting of the CEM cement was verified, followed by the application of a layer of resin-modified glass-ionomer. The tooth was then restored using amalgam. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups by blinded endodontists. Success rates were compared using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: Among the 97 patients with 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, all achieved clinical success. Radiographic success rates were 99% at 6 months and 96.9% at 1 year, regardless of pulp calcification. In the 6-month follow-up, success rates were 98.07% for non-calcified pulp chambers and 100% for calcified pulp chambers. At the 1-year follow-up, success rates were 96.1% and 97.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in radiographic success rate between the two groups at both follow-ups (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Full pulpotomy using CEM cement is a successful treatment for adult permanent teeth with calcified and non-calcified pulp chambers presenting signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis up to a 1-year follow-up. This study provides compelling evidence that vital pulp therapy can be effectively employed in the pulpotomy of calcified teeth, at least in the short term.

Keywords: CEM Cement; Calcified Teeth; Calcium-Enriched Mixture; Deep Caries; Full Pulpotomy; Irreversible Pulpitis; Vital Pulp Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Teeth were categorized into two groups based on the presence of calcification in their pulp chambers. The upper cases represent individuals with young non-calcified pulp, while the lower cases indicate those with calcified pulp chambers
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) The removal of pulp tissue was done by the high speed handpiece and continuous coolant and the pulp was cut to the canal orifices; B) CEM cement was prepared and placed on clot-free pulp tissue at canal orifices and the whole pulp chamber floor
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart of 1 year follow-up

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bjørndal L, Simon S, Tomson PL, Duncan HF. Management of Deep Caries and the Exposed Pulp. Int Endod J. 2019;52(7):949–73. - PubMed
    1. Bernabe E MW, Hernandez CR, Bailey J, et al. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J Dent Res. 2020;99(4):362–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caplan DJ, Cai J, Yin G, White BA. Root Canal Filled Versus Non-Root Canal Filled Teeth: A Retrospective Comparison of Survival Times. J Public Health Dent. 2005;65(2):90–6. - PubMed
    1. Awawdeh L, Hemaidat K, Al-Omari W. Higher Maximal Occlusal Bite Force in Endodontically Treated Teeth Versus Vital Contralateral Counterparts. J Endod. 2017;43(6):871–5. - PubMed
    1. Wells C DC, McCormack S. Vital Pulp Therapy for Endodontic Treatment of Mature Teeth: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines [Internet] Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546327. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources