Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;5(3):e301-e305.
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00258-6. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

The importance of using WHO International Standards to harmonise SARS-CoV-2 serological assays

Affiliations
Review

The importance of using WHO International Standards to harmonise SARS-CoV-2 serological assays

Heidi Hempel et al. Lancet Microbe. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the rapid development of tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection and ascertain the prevalence of infection, along with the formulation of various treatments and vaccines. Globally, over 220 anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological assays have been developed for laboratory use, and many of these assays are currently used to assess immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. However, because these assays were independently developed by different manufacturers with different target antigens, immunoglobulin detection, technologies, and data reporting approaches, the results are not directly comparable, making it challenging to draw conclusions regarding immune responses at the population level. With deficiencies in assay validation, standardisation, and harmonisation, the inability to use and compare large datasets is becoming a major issue as serological data continue to increase. To help in addressing this issue, WHO established the first International Standard for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin in late 2020. In this Personal View, we define the WHO International Standard for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin, summarise the uses of primary versus secondary serology standards, recommend the use of such standards for data harmonisation, and list guidance and resources for using serology standards to improve data comparability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interests We declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pinto LA, Shawar RM, O’Leary B, et al. A trans-governmental collaboration to independently evaluate SARS-CoV-2 serology assays. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10: e0156421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration, Policy for diagnostic tests for coronavirus disease-2019 during the public health emergency; immediately in effect guidance for clinical laboratories, commercial manufacturers, and Food and Drug Administration staff. Feb 29, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200410023229/https://www.fda.gov/media/135... (accessed Oct 31, 2023).
    1. FDA, Policy for coronavirus disease-2019 tests (revised); Originally published February 29th, 2020, revised March 16, May 4, May 11, 2020, November 15, 2021, and September 27, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents... (accessed Nov 2, 2023)
    1. The National SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assay Evaluation Group. Performance characteristics of five immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2: a head-to-head benchmark comparison. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 1390–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grzelak L, Temmam S, Planchais C, et al. A comparison of four serological assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum samples from different populations. Sci Transl Med 2020; 12: eabc3103. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances