Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study
- PMID: 38225524
- PMCID: PMC12081587
- DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01531-w
Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with a rare cancer face challenges, e.g., delayed diagnosis, that may affect trust in the healthcare system and the healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved. This study aimed to explore trust of patients with a rare cancer in their HCPs and the healthcare system.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 purposively sampled patients with a rare cancer. The interview guide included topics related to trust, including level, development, barriers and facilitators, importance, and trust dimensions. Thematic analysis was conducted with use of Atlas.ti.
Results: The mean age of patients was 50 years, 60% were female, and 70% were highly educated. Three themes were constructed: (1) "Confirmed expertise is a prerequisite of trust." Patients need confirmation of their HCPs' expertise, as it could not be assumed due to the rarity of their cancer; (2) "Trust depends on the adequacy of information and how it is provided." Limited information about rare cancer reduced patients' trust in health care, whereas interpersonal trust was mainly affected by how HCPs provided information; and (3) "Trust is built on properly coordinated and supportive care." Proper organization and cooperation within and between hospitals, and integration of supportive care, enhanced trust.
Conclusion: Patients with a rare cancer experience challenges that influence trust in HCPs and the healthcare system. Further research should examine trust among subgroups of patients with a rare cancer, to enable development of tailored interventions.
Implications for cancer survivors: HCPs may improve trust by focusing on expertise, effective information provision, proper coordination of care, and provision of adequate supportive care.
Keywords: Oncology; Patient-physician relationship; Rare cancer; Supportive care; Trust.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative descriptive study on the perspectives and experiences of multidisciplinary HCPs in providing nutritional care to older adults with cancer.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 25;33(3):221. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09254-7. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40000496 Free PMC article.
-
"As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):844-856. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0233. Epub 2018 Nov 9. Oncologist. 2019. PMID: 30413662 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 27;9:e54777. doi: 10.2196/54777. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 39869885 Free PMC article.
-
Personal barriers to addressing intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis of healthcare practitioners' experiences.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06582-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34107941 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Blood transfusion in haematology: A qualitative exploration of patients' and healthcare professionals' perceptions.Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Nov;27(4):1241-1274. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12597. Epub 2022 May 11. Br J Health Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35543198 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of cancer survivors in the United States.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Nov 1;116(11):1784-1790. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae135. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024. PMID: 39002121 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing cancer survivors' information needs and satisfaction: a systematic review of potential intervention components for survivors with a rare cancer type.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Oct 18;19(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03403-7. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024. PMID: 39425097 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Mistrust in Online Cancer Communities: A Large-Scale Analysis Across 10 Cancer Entities.Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70180. doi: 10.1002/pon.70180. Psychooncology. 2025. PMID: 40448945 Free PMC article.
-
Racial discrimination and health-care system trust among American adults with and without cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Nov 1;116(11):1845-1855. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae154. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024. PMID: 38937274 Free PMC article.
-
Trust in healthcare and perceived discrimination in Sweden: a fixed effects analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1557921. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1557921. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40567967 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rare Cancers Europe. What are rare cancers?
-
- Cancer research UK. Rare cancers. 2022.
-
- Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Botta L, Mallone S, De Angelis R, Ardanaz E, et al. Burden and centralised treatment in Europe of rare tumours: results of RARECAREnet—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1022–39. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30445-X. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical