Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 17;15(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01596-2.

Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact

Affiliations

Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact

Marion Smits et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

At the European Society of Radiology (ESR), we strive to provide evidence for radiological practices that improve patient outcomes and have a societal impact. Successful translation of radiological research into clinical practice requires multiple factors including tailored methodology, a multidisciplinary approach aiming beyond technical validation, and a focus on unmet clinical needs. Low levels of evidence are a threat to radiology, resulting in low visibility and credibility. Here, we provide the background and rationale for the thematic series Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact, inviting authors to describe their processes of achieving clinically impactful radiological research. We describe the challenges unique to radiological research. Additionally, a survey was sent to non-radiological clinical societies. The majority of respondents (6/11) were in the field of gastrointestinal/abdominal medicine. The implementation of CT/MRI techniques for disease characterisation, detection and staging of cancer, and treatment planning and radiological interventions were mentioned as the most important radiological developments in the past years. The perception was that patients are substantially unaware of the impact of these developments. Unmet clinical needs were mostly early diagnosis and staging of cancer, microstructural/functional assessment of tissues and organs, and implant assessment. All but one respondent considered radiology important for research in their discipline, but five indicated that radiology is currently not involved in their research. Radiology research holds the potential for being transformative to medical practice. It is our responsibility to take the lead in studies including radiology and strive towards the highest levels of evidence.Critical relevance statement For radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact, radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies, go beyond the assessment of technical feasibility and diagnostic accuracy, and-in a multidisciplinary approach-address clinical unmet needs.Key points• Multiple factors are essential for radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact.• Radiological research needs to go beyond diagnostic accuracy and address unmet clinical needs.• Radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies with a multidisciplinary approach.

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Health technology assessment; Methods; Radiology; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MS declares honoraria (paid to the institution) for consultancy from Bracco and for speaking from AuntMinnie, GE Healthcare, and Fondazione Internazionale Menarini.

AR declares Advisory Board and RoClub.

SNC is a co-founder of MyeloPro Diagnostics and Research GmbH and has been a consultant for GSK Belgium.

FS declares research grants from Bayer, Bracco, and General Electric.

LMB is a member of the non-profit Scientific Advisory Boards of Quibim SL, the Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), and the Instituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (CSIC-UPV). He is also Editor in Chief of Insights Into Imaging.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brady AP, Bello JA, Derchi LE, et al. Radiology in the era of value-based healthcare: a multi-society expert statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, IS3R, RANZCR, and RSNA. Insights Imaging. 2020;11:136. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00941-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP. Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1574-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:88–94. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kainberger F, Czembirek H, Fruhwald F, Pokieser P, Imhof H. Guidelines and algorithms: strategies for standardization of referral criteria in diagnostic radiology. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:673–679. doi: 10.1007/s003300101109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1767–1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources