Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):93.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-08993-y.

Socioeconomic impacts of airborne and droplet-borne infectious diseases on industries: a systematic review

Ely Zarina Samsudin  1 , Siti Munira Yasin  2 , Nur-Hasanah Ruslan  3 , Nik Nairan Abdullah  1 , Ahmad Faiz Azhari Noor  4 , Ahmad Fitri Abdullah Hair  4
Affiliations

Socioeconomic impacts of airborne and droplet-borne infectious diseases on industries: a systematic review

Ely Zarina Samsudin et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Recent pandemics have had far-reaching effects on the world's largest economies and amplified the need to estimate the full extent and range of socioeconomic impacts of infectious diseases outbreaks on multi-sectoral industries. This systematic review aims to evaluate the socioeconomic impacts of airborne and droplet-borne infectious diseases outbreaks on industries.

Methods: A structured, systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IDEAS/REPEC, OSHLINE, HSELINE, and NIOSHTIC-2 were reviewed. Study quality appraisal was performed using the Table of Evidence Levels from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Joanna Briggs Institute tools, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and Center of Evidence Based Management case study critical appraisal checklist. Quantitative analysis was not attempted due to the heterogeneity of included studies. A qualitative synthesis of primary studies examining socioeconomic impact of airborne and droplet-borne infectious diseases outbreaks in any industry was performed and a framework based on empirical findings was conceptualized.

Results: A total of 55 studies conducted from 1984 to 2021 were included, reporting on 46,813,038 participants working in multiple industries across the globe. The quality of articles were good. On the whole, direct socioeconomic impacts of Coronavirus Disease 2019, influenza, influenza A (H1N1), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, tuberculosis and norovirus outbreaks include increased morbidity, mortality, and health costs. This had then led to indirect impacts including social impacts such as employment crises and reduced workforce size as well as economic impacts such as demand shock, supply chain disruptions, increased supply and production cost, service and business disruptions, and financial and Gross Domestic Product loss, attributable to productivity losses from illnesses as well as national policy responses to contain the diseases.

Conclusions: Evidence suggests that airborne and droplet-borne infectious diseases have inflicted severe socioeconomic costs on regional and global industries. Further research is needed to better understand their long-term socioeconomic impacts to support improved industry preparedness and response capacity for outbreaks. Public and private stakeholders at local, national, and international levels must join forces to ensure informed systems and sector-specific cost-sharing strategies for optimal global health and economic security.

Keywords: Epidemic; Infectious disease; Outbreak; Pandemic; Socioeconomic burden; Socioeconomic cost; Socioeconomic impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the systematic review based on the PRISMA statement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Framework for socioeconomic impact of airborne and droplet-borne infectious disease on industries based on empirical findings
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The World Bank. World Bank Open Data. 2022. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org. Accessed 9 Jan 2023.
    1. Pamuk S, van Zanden JL. Chapter 9: standard of living. In: Broadberry S, O’Rourke KH, editors. The Cambridge economic history of modern Europe: Volume 1. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 1700–1870.
    1. Costa D, Steckel RH. Long-term trends in health, welfare, and economic growth in the United States. In: Steckel RH, Floud R, editors. Health and welfare during industrialization. United States of America: University of Chicago Press; 1997.
    1. Smith KM, Machalaba CC, Seifman R, Feferholtz Y, Karesh WB. Infectious disease and economics: the case for considering multi-sectoral impacts. One Health. 2019;7:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2018.100080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronaviirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg. 2020;78:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types