Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO-CCN)
- PMID: 38229251
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.16864
Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO-CCN)
Abstract
Aim: Several methods for assessing anastomotic integrity have been proposed, but the best is yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the different methods to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal.
Method: A retrospective cohort analysis on patients between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 with a defunctioning stoma for middle and low rectal anterior resection was performed. A propensity score matching comparison between patients who underwent proctoscopy alone and patients who underwent proctoscopy plus any other preoperative method to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal (transanal water-soluble contrast enema via conventional radiology, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT, and magnetic resonance) was performed.
Results: The analysis involved 1045 patients from 26 Italian referral colorectal centres. The comparison between proctoscopy alone versus proctoscopy plus any other preoperative tool showed no significant differences in terms of stenoses (p = 0.217) or leakages (p = 0.103) prior to ileostomy reversal, as well as no differences in terms of misdiagnosed stenoses (p = 0.302) or leakages (p = 0.509). Interestingly, in the group that underwent proctoscopy and transanal water-soluble contrast enema the comparison between the two procedures demonstrated no significant differences in detecting stenoses (2 vs. 0, p = 0.98), while there was a significant difference in detecting leakages in favour of transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT (3 vs. 12, p = 0.03).
Conclusions: We can confirm that proctoscopy alone should be considered sufficient prior to ileostomy reversal. However, in cases in which the results of proctoscopy are not completely clear or the surgeon remains suspicious of an anastomotic leakage, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT could guarantee its detection.
Keywords: contrast enema; ileostomy; leakage; proctoscopy; reversal.
© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of hand-sewn anterior repair, resection and hand-sewn anastomosis, resection and stapled anastomosis techniques for the reversal of diverting loop ileostomy after low anterior rectal resection: a randomized clinical trial.Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Feb 7;28(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02898-9. Tech Coloproctol. 2024. PMID: 38321328 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-Term Results of 2-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2024 Sep 1;159(9):990-996. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2262. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 38985480 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 7;2(2):CD014909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014909.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36748942 Free PMC article.
-
Water-Soluble Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Low Anterior Resection: Is It Necessary?J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Oct;20(10):1732-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3218-8. Epub 2016 Jul 29. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 27474098
-
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21901677 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection After Ileostomy Reversal: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 3;14(1):236. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010236. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39797318 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JWC, Seto CL. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long‐term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11605‐006‐0049‐Z
-
- Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Color Dis. 1998;13:160–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003840050158
-
- You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A, Poylin V, Francone TD, Davis K, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:1191–1222. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001762
-
- Moran B, Cunningham C, Singh T, Sagar P, Bradbury J, Geh I, et al. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): guidelines for the management of cancer of the colon, rectum and anus (2017) – surgical management. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:18–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13704
-
- Ferrara F, Parini D, Bondurri A, Veltri M, Barbierato M, Pata F, et al. Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23:1037–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10151‐019‐02099‐3
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources