Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 6;12(2):e0215323.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02153-23. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles

Affiliations

Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles

Graça Trigueiro et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Laboratory automation in microbiology improves productivity and reduces sample turnaround times (TATs). However, its full potential can be unlocked through the optimization of workflows by adopting lean principles. This study aimed to explore the relative impact of laboratory automation and continuous improvement events (CIEs) on productivity and TATs. Laboratory automation took place in November 2020 and consisted of the introduction of WASPLab and VITEK MS systems. CIEs were run in May and September 2021. Before the conversion, the laboratory processed about ~492 samples on weekdays and had 10 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff for a productivity of 49 samples/FTE/day. In March 2021, after laboratory automation, the caseload went up to ~621 while the FTEs decreased to 8.5, accounting for productivity improvement to 73 samples/FTE/day. The hypothetical productivity went up to 110 samples/FTE/day following CIEs, meaning that the laboratory could at that point deal with a caseload increase to ~935 with unchanged FTEs. Laboratory conversion also led to an improvement in TATs for all sample types. For vaginal swabs and urine samples, median TATs decreased from 70.3 h [interquartile range (IQR): 63.5-93.1] and 73.7 h (IQR: 35.6-50.7) to 48.2 h (IQR: 44.8-67.7) and 40.0 h (IQR: 35.6-50.7), respectively. Automation alone was responsible for 37.2% and 75.8% of TAT reduction, respectively, while the remaining reduction of 62.8% and 24.2%, respectively, was achieved due to CIEs. The laboratory reached productivity and TAT goals predefined by the management after CIEs. In conclusion, automation substantially improved productivity and TATs, while the subsequent implementation of lean management further unlocked the potential of laboratory automation.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we combined total laboratory automation with lean management to show that appropriate laboratory work organization enhanced the benefit of the automation and substantially contributed to productivity improvements. Globally, the rapid availability of accurate results in the setting of a clinical microbiology laboratory is part of patient-centered approaches to treat infections and helps the implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs backed by the World Health Organization. Locally, from the point of view of laboratory management, it is important to find ways of maximizing the benefits of the use of technology, as total laboratory automation is an expensive investment.

Keywords: change management; laboratory automation; lean principles; productivity; turnaround time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yohann Bala, Monica Gutiérrez Granado, Sandra Vallejo, and Victoria Gonzalez are employees of bioMérieux SA.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Improvement of TAT according to sample type. (A) Urine samples; (B) vaginal swabs; (C) stool samples.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Chronology of conversion and improvement through continuous improvement events.

References

    1. Bailey AL, Ledeboer N, Burnham C-A. 2019. Clinical microbiology is growing up: the total laboratory automation revolution. Clin Chem 65:634–643. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.274522 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cherkaoui A, Schrenzel J. 2022. Total laboratory automation for rapid detection and identification of microorganisms and their antimicrobial resistance profiles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:807668. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.807668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourbeau PP, Ledeboer NA. 2013. Automation in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol 51:1658–1665. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00301-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Culbreath K, Piwonka H, Korver J, Noorbakhsh M. 2021. Benefits derived from full laboratory automation in microbiology: a tale of four laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 59:e01969-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01969-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maurer FP, Christner M, Hentschke M, Rohde H. 2017. Advances in rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria in the clinical microbiology laboratory: implications for patient care and antimicrobial stewardship programs. Infect Dis Rep 9:6839. doi: 10.4081/idr.2017.6839 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources