Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 17;32(2):109.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08308-6.

Feasibility and effectiveness of communication tools for addressing intimacy and sexuality in patients with cancer: a systematic review

Susanne A M Arends  1   2   3 , Carlijn E van Rossum  4 , Corien M Eeltink  5 , Jantien E Robertus  4 , Linda J Schoonmade  6 , Anneke L Francke  4   7   8   9 , Irene P Jongerden  4   7   8
Affiliations

Feasibility and effectiveness of communication tools for addressing intimacy and sexuality in patients with cancer: a systematic review

Susanne A M Arends et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patients diagnosed with cancer might experience changes in intimacy and sexuality due to the illness itself, treatment, or psychological and social factors. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) often feel reluctant to discuss these changes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the feasibility and effectiveness of communication tools that support communication regarding changes in intimacy or sexuality among patients with cancer.

Methods: This is a systematic review. Databases are PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to June 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess included studies. Data were summarized in data charting forms.

Results: In total 35 studies were included, published between 2001 and 2023. Most had a quantitative design and moderate methodological quality. In 11 studies, the PLISSIT model (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, Intensive Therapy) was used. Tools were integrated in counselling sessions or training programmes for individual patients, couples, groups of patients, or HCPs. All tools were considered feasible by patients or HCPs. Twenty studies reported significant improvement in sexual functioning, quality of life, quality of care or combined outcomes.

Conclusion: Tools to support communication about changes in intimacy and sexuality among patients with cancer seem feasible and effective. The most commonly used tool, the PLISSIT model, proved to be feasible for HCPs and to have a positive effect on patients' and partners' sexual functioning and quality of life. Giving attention to changes in intimacy and sexuality seems to be important in itself, regardless of the communication tool or approach used.

Keywords: Communication; Intimacy; Oncology; Quality of care; Quality of life; Sexuality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart [36]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Vocht H, Hordern A, Notter J, van de Wiel H. Stepped skills: a team approach towards communication about sexuality and intimacy in cancer and palliative care. Australas Med J. 2011;4(11):610–619. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reese JB, Porter LS, Regan KR, Keefe FJ, Azad NS, Diaz LA, Jr, et al. A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Psychooncology. 2014;23(9):1005–1013. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reese JB, Zimmaro LA, Lepore SJ, Sorice KA, Handorf E, Daly MB, et al. Evaluating a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woods NF. Toward a holistic perspective of human sexuality: alterations in sexual health and nursing diagnoses. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987;1(4):1–11. - PubMed
    1. WHO (2006) Defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research/ke.... Assessed May 2023

Publication types