Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 16;9(1):e013280.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013280.

Development of a cross-sectoral antimicrobial resistance capability assessment framework

Affiliations

Development of a cross-sectoral antimicrobial resistance capability assessment framework

Angeline S Ferdinand et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent and growing global health concern, and a clear understanding of existing capacities to address AMR, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), is needed to inform national priorities, investment targets and development activities. Across LMICs, there are limited data regarding existing mechanisms to address AMR, including national AMR policies, current infection prevention and antimicrobial prescribing practices, antimicrobial use in animals, and microbiological testing capacity for AMR. Despite the development of numerous individual tools designed to inform policy formulation and implementation or surveillance interventions to address AMR, there is an unmet need for easy-to-use instruments that together provide a detailed overview of AMR policy, practice and capacity. This paper describes the development of a framework comprising five assessment tools which provide a detailed assessment of country capacity to address AMR within both the human and animal health sectors. The framework is flexible to meet the needs of implementers, as tools can be used separately to assess the capacity of individual institutions or as a whole to align priority-setting and capacity-building with AMR National Action Plans (NAPs) or national policies. Development of the tools was conducted by a multidisciplinary team across three phases: (1) review of existing tools; (2) adaptation of existing tools; and (3) piloting, refinement and finalisation. The framework may be best used by projects which aim to build capacity and foster cross-sectoral collaborations towards the surveillance of AMR, and by LMICs wishing to conduct their own assessments to better understand capacity and capabilities to inform future investments or the implementation of NAPs for AMR.

Keywords: Health systems evaluation; Infections, diseases, disorders, injuries; Medical microbiology; Public Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. WHO . Antimicrobial resistance. 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance
    1. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, et al. . Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022;399:629–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations: government of the United Kingdom; 2016.
    1. de Kraker MEA, Stewardson AJ, Harbarth S. Will 10 million people die a year due to antimicrobial resistance by 2050? PLOS Med 2016;13:e1002184. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002184 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pokharel S, Raut S, Adhikari B. Tackling antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2019;4:e002104. 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002104 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances