Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study): a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 38233878
- PMCID: PMC10792789
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07832-w
Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study): a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and immunoglobulin gamma. Ongoing AIH activity can lead to fibrosis and (decompensated) cirrhosis. Incomplete biochemical response is the most important risk factor for liver transplantation or liver-related mortality. First-line treatment consists of a combination of azathioprine and prednisolone. If CR is not reached, tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used as second-line therapy. Both products are registered for the prevention of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TAC and MMF as second-line treatment for AIH.
Methods: The TAILOR study is a phase IIIB, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial performed in large teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. We will enrol 86 patients with AIH who have not reached CR after at least 6 months of treatment with first-line therapy. Patients are randomised to TAC (0.07 mg/kg/day initially and adjusted by trough levels) or MMF (max 2000 mg/day), stratified by the presence of cirrhosis at inclusion. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 6 months, adverse effects, difference in fibrogenesis, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
Discussion: This is the first randomised controlled trial comparing two second-line therapies for AIH. Currently, second-line treatment is based on retrospective cohort studies. The rarity of AIH is the main issue in clinical research for alternative treatment options. The results of this trial can be implemented in existing international clinical guidelines.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05221411 . Retrospectively registered on 3 February 2022; EudraCT number 2021-003420-33. Prospectively registered on 16 June 2021.
Keywords: AIH; Autoimmune hepatitis; Autoimmune liver disease; Complete biochemical response; Mycophenolate mofetil; Randomised controlled trials; Second-line treatment; Tacrolimus.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Although the LUMC pharmacy procures Envarsus at a discounted rate, this arrangement has no bearing on the study and is unrelated to the content of this manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessing the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (CAMARO trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Dec 13;23(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06890-w. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36514163 Free PMC article.
-
An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis.J Hepatol. 2024 Apr;80(4):576-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.11.032. Epub 2023 Dec 14. J Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 38101756 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus as Second-line Therapy for Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1950-1956.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 8. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28603052
-
A review of the utility of tacrolimus in the management of adults with autoimmune hepatitis.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;54(1):76-80. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1551498. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30650311 Review.
-
Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as second-line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis: Is the evidence of sufficient quality to develop recommendations?World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 14;26(38):5896-5910. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i38.5896. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 33132643 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Hard-to-treat autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis: The dawn of a new era of pharmacological treatment.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025 Jan;31(1):90-104. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0821. Epub 2024 Nov 11. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 39523716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quo vadis autoimmune hepatitis? - Summary of the 5th international autoimmune hepatitis group research workshop 2024.JHEP Rep. 2024 Nov 12;7(2):101265. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101265. eCollection 2025 Feb. JHEP Rep. 2024. PMID: 39897612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution of Therapy in Autoimmune Hepatitis.Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025 Mar;21(3):152-160. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025. PMID: 40115657 Free PMC article.
-
Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver (HASL): revised clinical practice guidelines for autoimmune hepatitis.Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov-Dec;37(6):623-654. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0924. Epub 2024 Oct 24. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39568707 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical