Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review
- PMID: 38233923
- PMCID: PMC10792802
- DOI: 10.1186/s12937-023-00884-3
Components in downstream health promotions to reduce sugar intake among adults: a systematic review
Abstract
Excessive sugar consumption is well documented as a common risk factor for many Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). Thus, an adequate intervention description is important to minimise research waste and improve research usability and reproducibility. A systematic review was conducted to identify components in published evidence interventions pertaining to the health promotions on reducing sugar intake among adults. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal. The period for the selected study was from 2000 to 2022, and articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Medline, Scopus, and PubMed. The target population was adults aged 18 years old and above who underwent intervention to assess the changes in their sugar intake. Data sources and all human epidemiologic studies were included. Out of the 9,333 papers identified, 25 were included. The overall quality of evidence of the studies was considered moderate. Apart from the characteristics of the reviewed studies, components of interventions are including the basis of theoretical or model for the intervention, which majority use Social Cognitive Theory, followed by PRECEDE-PROCEED model, socio-ecological and process-improvement theories and Transtheoretical Model; providers, who are commercial provider, qualified nutritionist, professor of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics, doctor, dietitian nutritionist, lifestyle coaches, and junior public health nurses; duration of the intervention and follow-up time, varies from as short as one month to as long as 24 months; material provided either softcopy or hardcopy; tailoring approach, based on the individual goals, the process of change, genotype analysis, beliefs, barriers, and sociocultural norms; delivery mechanism either face-to-face or technology-mediated; and tools to measure the sugar consumption outcome mostly used Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), besides 24-h dietary recalls, and food diaries. There are various components in downstream health promotion to reduce sugar intake among adults that can be adapted according to the local health promotion and intervention context. More well-designed interventions using integration components are encouraged in further studies.
Keywords: Adults; Dietary sugars; Health behaviour; Health promotion; Sugars.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27545902 Free PMC article.
-
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28944453 Free PMC article.
-
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Epidemiol Prev. 2013. PMID: 23851286 Italian.
-
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26368271 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
Cited by
-
Why Is Caries Prevention in Children So Difficult? A Narrative Opinion.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 3;21(10):1316. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101316. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39457289 Free PMC article.
-
A pioneering health education strategy based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model for women's health challenges: a systematic review and logic framework.BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03883-0. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40616055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shahbandeh M. Sugar consumption worldwide 2010/11-2021/22. 2022 14 November 2022]; Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/249681/total-consumption-of-sugar-wo....
-
- Paglia L. The sweet danger of added sugars. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(2):89. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources