Dual-chamber versus single chamber pacemakers, a systemic review and meta-analysis on sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block patients
- PMID: 38234924
- PMCID: PMC10792191
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23877
Dual-chamber versus single chamber pacemakers, a systemic review and meta-analysis on sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block patients
Abstract
Aims: The atrioventricular block (AVB) is a conduction system problem that results from the impairment in the transmission of an impulse from the atria to the ventricle, the disease has many etiologies. This article aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual and single-chamber pacemakers in patients with SSS and AVB.
Methods: An electronic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed from 2000 till August 15th, 2022. Retrieved articles were exported to Endnote Reference Library Software, where duplicate studies were removed from the list, and only articles meeting the eligibility criteria of this study were selected. RevMan 5.4 and STATA 16 software were used for the analysis. The modified Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias and New-castle Ottawa scale were used for quality assessment of RCTs and observational studies respectively.
Results: This study is composed of 8953 patients with sick-sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. A total of thirteen outcomes are included in this meta-analysis, out of which atrial fibrillation significantly favored dual chamber [OR = 1.29; 95 % CI = 1.05-1.59; P = 0.01 I2 = 29 %] and overall complications [OR = 0.48; 95 % CI = 0.29-0.77; p = 0.03 I2 = 0 %] and pneumothorax [OR = 0.31; 95 % CI = 0.10-0.93; p = 0.04, I2 = 0 %] were satisfied by single-chamber pacing.
Conclusion: This study concluded that neither single-chamber nor dual-chamber pacemakers are superior to each other, but they are unique in their own ways as the results of this study manifest remarkable reduction in atrial fibrillation rates and pneumothorax using dual-chamber and single-chamber pacemakers respectively.
Keywords: Atrioventricular block; Heart failure care; Sick-sinus syndrome; atrial fibrillation; pacemaker.
© 2023 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Tracy C.M., Epstein A.E., Darbar D., DiMarco J.P., Dunbar S.B., Estes N.A., 3rd, Ferguson T.B., Jr., Hammill S.C., Karasik P.E., Link M.S., Marine J.E., Schoenfeld M.H., Shanker A.J., Silka M.J., Stevenson L.W., Stevenson W.G., Varosy P.D., Ellenbogen K.A., Freedman R.A., Gettes L.S., Gillinov A.M., Gregoratos G., Hayes D.L., Page R.L., Stevenson L.W., Sweeney M.O. American College of cardiology foundation; American heart association task force on practice guidelines; heart rhythm society. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. [corrected] Circulation. 2012 Oct 2;126(14):1784–1800. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182618569. Epub 2012 Sep 10. Erratum in: Circulation. 2013 Jan 22;127(3):e357-1800. Heart Rhythm Society [added]. PMID: 22965336. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jensen P.N., Gronroos N.N., Chen L.Y., Folsom A.R., deFilippi C., Heckbert S.R., Alonso A. Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 Aug 12;64(6):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.056. PMID: 25104519; PMCID: PMC4139053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rodriguez R.D., Schocken D.D. Update on sick sinus syndrome, a cardiac disorder of aging. Geriatrics. 1990 Jan;45(1):26–30. 33-6. PMID: 2403955. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
