Analysis of questionnaire survey to determine worldwide trends in prescriptions of biologics for the treatment of unresponsive chronic urticaria
- PMID: 38235261
- PMCID: PMC10793168
- DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100858
Analysis of questionnaire survey to determine worldwide trends in prescriptions of biologics for the treatment of unresponsive chronic urticaria
Abstract
Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common condition treated by allergist/immunologists, but the only FDA-approved biologic medication, omalizumab, may be underutilized globally.
Objective: This study was performed to determine the global prescription of omalizumab for treatment of CSU by allergists/immunologists.
Methods: Anonymous questionnaire surveys were distributed online to World Allergy Organization (WAO) members worldwide. Categorical data were analyzed for descriptive analysis using one-way frequency tabulation in SAS 9.4.
Results: There were 348 respondents (43 missing data); Average age 51 (range 28-90); M/F 48%/52%. 58% had > 15 years of clinical experience and 10% < 5; 42% worked in private clinics, 36% public hospitals, 24% academia, 18% private hospitals, and 4% in community practice. Eighty-two percent (82%) prescribed omalizumab for CSU patients and use of omalizumab was highest among young practitioners. The most significant barriers were cost (63%) and restricted formulary (24%). Drug safety (63%) and chances of adverse events (47%) were the most significant factors deciding treatment. Twenty-two percent (22%) reported 80-100% of CSU patients were complete responders to omalizumab; 34% preferred increasing frequency (q 2-weeks), and 18% preferred increasing dose (600 mg q 4-weeks) for partial or non-responders. UAS7, UCT, and CU-QoL were used to assess CSU by 55%, 29%, and 25% of respondents, respectively. Autoimmune thyroid disease (62%), thyroid abnormality (43%) and allergic rhinitis (35%) were the most frequent comorbidities reported.
Conclusions: Most clinicians favored omalizumab over other potential treatments due to safety. Although younger clinicians were more likely to prescribe omalizumab, cost and formulary access were major barriers. Only 22% of respondents reported 80% or greater of their patients had complete response to omalizumab, indicating the need for novel CSU therapies.
Keywords: Adverse effects; Alternative therapy; Biologics; Chronic spontaneous urticaria; Clinical research; Epidemiology; H1-antihistamines; Monitoring; Practice management; Safety.
© 2023 The Authors.
Figures
References
-
- Zuberbier T., Abdul Latiff A.H., Abuzakouk M., et al. The international EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022;77(3):734–766. - PubMed
-
- Bernstein J.A., Lang D.M., Khan D.A., et al. The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(5):1270–1277. - PubMed
-
- Ben-Shoshan M., Blinderman I., Raz A. Psychosocial factors and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review. Allergy. 2013;68(2):131–141. - PubMed
-
- Goldstein S., Eftekhari S., Mitchell L., et al. Perspectives on living with chronic spontaneous urticaria: from onset through diagnosis and disease management in the US. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(12):1091–1098. - PubMed