Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Assessment of genetically modified maize DP915635 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-172)

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Genetically modified maize DP915635 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate herbicide and resistance to corn rootworm pests. These properties were achieved by introducing the ipd079Ea, mo-pat and pmi expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP915635 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for the levels of crude protein in forage, which does not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the IPD079Ea, PAT and PMI proteins expressed in maize DP915635. The GMO Panel finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP915635. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP915635 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP915635 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM maize varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP915635 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP915635. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP915635 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Keywords: DP915635; GM; IPD079Ea; PAT; PMI; genetic engineering; import and processing; maize (Zea mays).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.

Similar articles

  • Assessment of genetically modified maize DP23211 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-163).
    EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Mullins E, Bresson JL, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Ardizzone M, Camargo AM, De Sanctis G, Federici S, Fernández A, Gennaro A, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Goumperis T, Kagkli DM, Lenzi P, Lewandowska A, Neri FM, Papadopoulou N, Raffaello T. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), et al. EFSA J. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):e8483. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8483. eCollection 2024 Jan. EFSA J. 2024. PMID: 38239495 Free PMC article.
  • Assessment of genetically modified maize DP51291 (application GMFF-2021-0071).
    EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Casacuberta J, Barro F, Braeuning A, Cubas P, de Maagd R, Epstein MM, Frenzel T, Gallois JL, Koning F, Messéan A, Moreno FJ, Nogué F, Savoini G, Schulman AH, Tebbe C, Veromann E, Ardizzone M, De Santis G, Federici S, Fernandez Dumont A, Gennaro A, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Goumperis T, Grammatikou P, Kagkli DM, Lenzi P, Lewandowska A, Martin Camargo A, Neri FM, Piffanelli P, Raffaello T, Xiftou K. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), et al. EFSA J. 2024 Nov 11;22(11):e9059. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9059. eCollection 2024 Nov. EFSA J. 2024. PMID: 39529753 Free PMC article.
  • Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87419 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140).
    EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Mullins E, Bresson JL, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Serrano JJS, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Ardizzone M, De Sanctis G, Federici S, Fernandez Dumont A, Gennaro A, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Goumperis T, Lanzoni A, Lenzi P, Lewandowska A, Camargo AM, Neri FM, Papadopoulou N, Paraskevopoulos K, Raffaello T. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), et al. EFSA J. 2023 Jan 20;21(1):e07730. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7730. eCollection 2023 Jan. EFSA J. 2023. PMID: 36698492 Free PMC article.
  • Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
  • Transgenic maize event TC1507: Global status of food, feed, and environmental safety.
    Baktavachalam GB, Delaney B, Fisher TL, Ladics GS, Layton RJ, Locke ME, Schmidt J, Anderson JA, Weber NN, Herman RA, Evans SL. Baktavachalam GB, et al. GM Crops Food. 2015;6(2):80-102. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1054093. GM Crops Food. 2015. PMID: 26018138 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

  • Assessment of genetically modified soybean DBN9004 (application EFSA-GMO-BE-2019-165).
    EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Casacuberta J, Barro F, Braeuning A, de Maagd R, Epstein MM, Frenzel T, Gallois JL, Koning F, Messéan A, Moreno FJ, Nogué F, Savoini G, Schulman AH, Tebbe C, Veromann E, Ardizzone M, De Sanctis G, Fernández Dumont A, Ferrari A, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Goumperis T, Kagkli DM, Lewandowska A, Camargo AM, Piffanelli P, Raffaello T, Sánchez-Brunete E. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), et al. EFSA J. 2025 Jul 7;23(7):e9503. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9503. eCollection 2025 Jul. EFSA J. 2025. PMID: 40626199 Free PMC article.
  • Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-159).
    EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Mullins E, Bresson JL, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Ardizzone M, Camargo AM, De Sanctis G, Federici S, Fernandez A, Gennaro A, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Goumperis T, Grammatikou P, Kagkli DM, Lenzi P, Neri FM, Papadopoulou N, Raffaello T. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), et al. EFSA J. 2024 Mar 20;22(3):e8655. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8655. eCollection 2024 Mar. EFSA J. 2024. PMID: 38510324 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Alimentarius, C. (2009). Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. https://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm
    1. Boeckman, C. J. , Ballou, S. , Gunderson, T. , Huang, E. , Linderblood, C. , Olson, T. , Stolte, B. , LeRoy, K. , Walker, C. , Wang, Y. , Woods, R. , & Zhang, J. (2022). Characterization of the spectrum of activity of IPD079Ea: A protein derived from Ophioglossum pendulum (Ophioglossales: Ophioglossaceae) with activity against Western corn rootworm [Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 115(5), 1531–1538. 10.1093/jee/toac079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breiteneder, H. , & Mills, E. N. (2005). Molecular properties of food allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 115, 14–23. - PubMed
    1. Costa, J. , Bavaro, S. L. , Benede, S. , Diaz‐Perales, A. , Bueno‐Diaz, C. , Gelencser, E. , Klueber, J. , Larre, C. , Lozano‐Ojalvo, D. , Lupi, R. , Mafra, I. , Mazzucchelli, G. , Molina, E. , Monaci, L. , Martın‐Pedraza, L. , Piras, C. , Rodrigues, P. M. , Roncada, P. , Schrama, D. , … Holzhauser, T. (2022). Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens? Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, 62, 37–63. 10.1007/s12016-020-08810-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastham, K. , & Sweet, J. (2002). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer . European Environment Agency, environmental issue report, 28, 1–75. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2002_28