Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;37(3):597-610.
doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01830-6. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

Pregnancy-associated changes in urinary uromodulin excretion in chronic hypertension

Affiliations

Pregnancy-associated changes in urinary uromodulin excretion in chronic hypertension

Sheon Mary et al. J Nephrol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy involves major adaptations in renal haemodynamics, tubular, and endocrine functions. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Uromodulin is a nephron-derived protein that is associated with hypertension and kidney diseases. Here we study the role of urinary uromodulin excretion in hypertensive pregnancy.

Methods: Urinary uromodulin was measured by ELISA in 146 pregnant women with treated chronic hypertension (n = 118) and controls (n = 28). We studied non-pregnant and pregnant Wistar Kyoto and Stroke Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats (n = 8/strain), among which a group of pregnant Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats was treated with either nifedipine (n = 7) or propranolol (n = 8).

Results: In pregnant women, diagnosis of chronic hypertension, increased maternal body mass index, Black maternal ethnicity and elevated systolic blood pressure at the first antenatal visit were significantly associated with a lower urinary uromodulin-to-creatinine ratio. In rodents, pre-pregnancy urinary uromodulin excretion was twofold lower in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats than in Wistar Kyoto rats. During pregnancy, the urinary uromodulin excretion rate gradually decreased in Wistar Kyoto rats (a twofold decrease), whereas a 1.5-fold increase was observed in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats compared to pre-pregnancy levels. Changes in uromodulin were attributed by kidney injury in pregnant rats. Neither antihypertensive changed urinary uromodulin excretion rate in pregnant Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats.

Conclusions: In summary, we demonstrate pregnancy-associated differences in urinary uromodulin: creatinine ratio and uromodulin excretion rate between chronic hypertensive and normotensive pregnancies. Further research is needed to fully understand uromodulin physiology in human pregnancy and establish uromodulin's potential as a biomarker for renal adaptation and renal function in pregnancy.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Chronic hypertensive pregnancy; Kidney physiology; Uromodulin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Spot urinary uromodulin:creatinine ratio (mg/g) by gestational age (weeks) at sampling in participants with chronic hypertension (CHT) and controls. Repeated sampling episodes in a single participant are joined by solid lines. Trend lines with 95% confidence intervals were fitted using the Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) method. No clear trend between urinary uromodulin:creatinine ratio and gestational age is observed in either CHT or controls. b Plot of change in urinary uromodulin:creatinine ratio (mg/g) and change in systolic and diastolic BP between sampling episodes in participants with repeated samples across pregnancy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Uromodulin excretion rate increased pregnant Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats a Systolic blood pressure measured by tail-cuff in Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) (n = 8) and Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive rats (SHRSP) (n = 8) before and during pregnancy. Repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 strain difference in pregnant WKY and SHRSP. GD gestational day, PP pre-pregnancy. b The urinary uromodulin excretion in pregnant SHRSP increased compared to pregnant WKY. Repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 difference compared to pre-pregnancy within the strain, a p < 0.05 pre-pregnancy strain difference. GD gestational day, PP pre-pregnancy. c There was no change in uromodulin mRNA level in pregnant (at GD 18.5) and age-matched non-pregnant female rats in both the strains (n = 8 per condition per strain). d Pregnant SHRSP (at GD 18.5) showed increase in total kidney uromodulin level compared to non-pregnant SHRSP and pregnant WKY. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 (Student’s t test). NP non-pregnan, P pregnant. The mRNA expression of e neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and f kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) were assessed in pregnant (at GD18.5) and age-matched non-pregnant female rats in both the strains. Student’s t test. NP Non-pregnant, P pregnant
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of nifedipine and propranolol treatment on blood pressure and uromodulin. a Nifedipine (PNif, n = 7) reduced systolic blood pressure in pregnant SHRSP compared to propranolol (PProp, n = 8) and placebo pregnant SHRSP (n = 8). Repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 difference with nifedipine treatment in pregnant SHRSP, aa p < 0.01 difference between nifedipine- and placebo- treated pregnant SHRSP. Anti-hypertensive treatments in pregnant SHRSP did not reduce the kidney injury markers NGAL (b) and KIM1 (c). Student’s T test. Antihypertensive treatment did not change uromodulin in pregnant SHRSP at d mRNA level, e kidney protein level and f urinary excretion rate. Repeated measure ANOVA with multiple comparisons or Students’ T test. SHRSP-P: placebo treated pregnant SHRSP (n = 8); SHRSP-PNif: nifedipine treated pregnant SHRSP (n = 7) and SHRSP-PProp: propranolol treated pregnant SHRSP (n = 8)

Similar articles

References

    1. Seely EW, Ecker J. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;129:1254–1261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003904. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bateman BT, Bansil P, Hernandez-Diaz S, Mhyre JM, Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV. Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(134):e131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.878. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, Corvalan C, Uauy R, Herring S, Gillman MW. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30217-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Khalaf SY, O'reilly EJ, Barrett PM, Df BL, Pawley LC, Mccarthy FP, Khashan AS. Impact of chronic hypertension and antihypertensive treatment on adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018494. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018494. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulletins ACOP. ACOG practice bulletin. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01471-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms